Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Coach: Only Floyd Mayweather Can Really Test GGG

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BillyBoxing
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2009
    • 7454
    • 488
    • 62
    • 50,228

    #101
    Originally posted by joseph5620
    That's not what you said at all. You said they were both "good boxers but Crawford had more power." That was it.

    Now you're being the typical idiotic boxing fan by calling Postol a "stiff" AFTER he lost the fight.


    Nothing else to see here.
    You're the typical idiotic boxing fan who can't accept a critic on a fighter for whatever reason.

    ANSWER PLEASE:
    Is Postol a stiff fighter or not?

    Am I wrong or right? Because, that's really what is important about a statement.

    Between, I said stiff but never said Postol was bad, he's a good boxer, but lacks power and movements.
    Crawford can box, but also can punch, he is a more complete package, and hell that's what I meant.

    Comment

    • aboutfkntime
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 47370
      • 1,631
      • 3,563
      • 391,308

      #102
      Originally posted by BillyBoxing
      Brook in UK is bigger than any of those guys.

      Brook has been on the UK scene for years facing Hatton bro, Jennings and the NDou of the world before getting the Porter's IBF belt.

      And don't act like Brook was their first "UK choice" and like Jacobs, Saunders, Ward, Ramirez and Degale were available.

      Come on man, Brook is an unproven welter.

      And I do not believe that Brook is a big draw, not one bit.

      They could have simply selected someone else.

      Comment

      • BillyBoxing
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2009
        • 7454
        • 488
        • 62
        • 50,228

        #103
        Originally posted by aboutfkntime
        Come on man, Brook is an unproven welter.

        And I do not believe that Brook is a big draw, not one bit.

        They could have simply selected someone else.
        He's in the UK as I said, and has beaten Porter, beating Porter put Thurman number 1, who has beaten Thurmann except Porter...

        He did beat Porter in a better fashion than Thurmann, outclassed Porter, he's the best welter IMO along with Manny then Thurman.

        Comment

        • aboutfkntime
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2015
          • 47370
          • 1,631
          • 3,563
          • 391,308

          #104
          Originally posted by BillyBoxing
          He's in the UK as I said, and has beaten Porter, beating Porter put Thurman number 1, who has beaten Thurmann except Porter...

          He did beat Porter in a better fashion than Thurmann, outclassed Porter, he's the best welter IMO along with Manny then Thurman.

          he could be, it would not surprise me, he is definitely one of the best.....

          Brook, Pac, Spence, Thurman are the best welters imho..... but like Thurman said, there are waaay too many unanswered questions to even start guessing, especially considering most of those matchups are pick-em fights.

          Him and Brook needed to fight next, the timing would have been prefect for that fight.

          None of those guys have been sternly tested other than Pac.

          Truth be known, Pac is probably still the best.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP