The fight was a MW fight, Qullin missed weight that's the fact. You're an idiot trying to argue otherwise.
No, it wasn't.
The fight was contracted @ middleweight but it was NOT contested @ middleweight. What is it about weight classes that you fail to comprehend? Middleweight has a LIMIT of 160lbs. ANYTHING over this limit is NOT a middleweight contest.
I just realized a simple truth. If you take away Adrien Broner's fights @ welter, his resume defecates and urinates all over Bumlovkin's.
Lol..
Hell no and p4p GGG would beat his ass worst than Maidana did. He wouldn't be able walk back to locker room with his head down. The fans would be tossinh things at him while he's being carried out on the stretcher.
The fight was contracted @ middleweight but it was NOT contested @ middleweight. What is it about weight classes that you fail to comprehend? Middleweight has a LIMIT of 160lbs. ANYTHING over this limit is NOT a middleweight contest.
1 + 1 = 2
you keep saying 1+1=2... are you trying to prove to us that you know simple math in order to validate your opinion? its not working.
Stevens lol....is a fringe contender man....never even beat a top ten guy himself
GGG has fought 1 reiging titleholder...lemieux
Ward has fought 2 ....Froch and Kessler(he only lost to hall of fame calibre guys)...3 if you count Dawson who was champ at 175 when they fought at 168
ggg...3 titlists defeated.....ouma was washed up........ward beat 5....all in their prime
it really sucks for you to big up a fighter that so many as accomplished more than then trash guys more proven
What makes Froch and Kessler great wins? Who did they ever beat?
Golovkin does not belong on that list. If he hasn't even had a major fight, then how in the world is he among the best of the past 25 years? This shows how hype can influence even boxing experts. Golovkin could lose his next fights, and the people who voted for him would look extremely biased for having put him there in the first place. With something as important as categorizing the best of a time period, it should not be left up to chance, or to what you personally imagine will happen.
And I just notice they listed Tito Trinidad as #11, while having Cotto as #21. That is bewildering. Cotto has not only accomplished more than Tito, but he also would likely have beaten Trinidad in a prime vs prime match-up. This list is a popularity contest. -_-
Comment