who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

[Dosumpthin]

No you dumb****. The NSAC has an approved list.



Now shut the **** up you moron.

You were qouting a section that says "prohibited acts"

Nsac didnt say its ok like you imply. Let alone its ok for floyd.

Nsac ,at that time, refered to the WADA code for banned substances. NOT BANNED METHODS.

Dont understand why people try to spin this.
The only thing you have left is to say floyd was using the iv mask. Stop with the illegal iv spin thing. Prove he was masking peds.

[Lester Tutor]

Noting in the above diatribe supports the original claim. Its just run on bull****.[/QUOTE]

"Nevada rules permit the mixes that Mayweather took, but because USADA was overseeing the testing he applied for and was granted the TUE for them.

All tests came back negative." May 22nd(Kevin Iole Yahoo Sports)

Hauser's article was on which day?

Original claim? dorks.

[SUBZER0ED]

Your like 3 months behind.


Yes. He contridicted himself. Thats why i posted the statement, of clarifing the IV issue.


Bennet is correct, if it was banned, then USADA can not be the sole grantor of a tue for NSAC rules.....

But you can not issue a theraputic use exemption for something that is not exempt.

Did you not read anything i posted?

Alright chief, have it your way; Mayweather's a saint, Bennett made an honest mistake in his previous statements of the IV affair being unacceptable, the NSAC and USADA are fine, upstanding organizations that are not in Mayweather's pocket. Anyone who says anything to the contrary are just butt hurt haters who want to see "saint" Floyd burn. Happy? Wait, is that a blue bird on my shoulder? Well, zippity fuckin' do da!

[Dosumpthin]

Alright chief, have it your way; Mayweather's a saint, Bennett made an honest mistake in his previous statements of the IV affair being unacceptable, the NSAC and USADA are fine, upstanding organizations that are not in Mayweather's pocket. Anyone who says anything to the contrary are just butt hurt haters who want to see "saint" Floyd burn. Happy? Wait, is that a blue bird on my shoulder? Well, zippity fuckin' do da!

Lol.

I gave you official statements/codes from the organizations involved....


You only provided links that all revovle around one single editorial full of misinformation that has been torn to shreds.


You have a choice to believe in a grand conspiracy that requires everyone involved to be corrupt OR manny simply got outboxed.

[Lester Tutor]

You were qouting a section that says "prohibited acts"

Nsac didnt say its ok like you imply. Let alone its ok for floyd.

Nsac ,at that time, refered to the WADA code for banned substances. NOT BANNED METHODS.

Dont understand why people try to spin this.
The only thing you have left is to say floyd was using the iv mask. Stop with the illegal iv spin thing. Prove he was masking peds.

Here's another way to spin it, from Conte's point of view:

"I don't like the term Olympic style testing..." (referring to boxing)

The same Conte, of course after serving prison, states that the Olympics are also tainted with PED users, the same ones that undergo the "year round 24/7"

Conte claims that any athlete not in the "season" can be doping and therefore can be cheating towards the fight. So he uses that whenever its easy to compare Olympic style to the way commissions do testing, yet not specifically talking about VADA or USADA. Why? Because they follow WADA protocols. As we stated in the past year per even Margaret Goodman, the CEO of VADA, says that the commissions aren't good enough to do testing. That WADA procedures are too expensive which is probably why the commissions don't promote it rather they do testings themselves...

Then Conte says that USADA is way too expensive... as if criticizing restaurants and pricing..

Floyd just stated Olympic style in the sense that Top Rank was rinsing no needles for years..

We don't even know how VADA operates with Donaire on year round...which Conte perhaps accidentally fcked up by saying that if Donaire's fighter doesn't agree to the year round testing the fight is off? What have Donaire's tests even shown. Seems a long time ago HBO, Goodman, etc. were spewing about year round yet have they ever given a report about his results on the program as beneficial to encourage other fighters? Why only Donaire? Why did Arum have a fit when Rigo wanted USADA as well threatening the fight off? Lol. Both parties wouod send results to WADA accredited labs? Rigo is a two time Gold medalist. Surely he knows and also pays off WADA accredited labs and sneaks the results back to USADA? Why did Donaire lose whren USADA was implemented?

HBO is a massive corrupt organization.

I just recently added the video of Conte admitting that Pac was juicing!!

[Lester Tutor]

No you dumb****. The NSAC has an approved list.




Now shut the **** up you moron.

Read #4. Didn't you in previous comments highlight injections?

The approved list you just highlighted are banned substances? Or rather banned substances or non banned substances require approval from the NSAC?

Try not to fall for the bait.. think before you respond.

And again, not finding banned substances in the blood is a bltch innit, like Hauser showing Floyd's results from 2011 in his USADA article?

We can do circles on this like a UD 120-108.

[GTTofAK]

Nevada rules permit the mixes that Mayweather took, but because USADA was overseeing the testing he applied for and was granted the TUE for them

Cite the rule hyperbole is not evidence you dumb****.

[GTTofAK]

The approved list you just highlighted are banned substances? Or rather banned substances or non banned substances require approval from the NSAC?

If you are too ****ing ****** to read it and understand it that is not my problem.

[Lester Tutor]

If you are too ****ing ****** to read it and understand it that is not my problem.

Rhetorical questions innit lol

[GTTofAK]

Rhetorical questions innit lol

No they weren't. You have proven that you are quite ******. You cant understand the rules you are reading. In our previous arguments you have interpreted the NSAC rules in such a way as for blood doping to be legal.

If IV re-hydration is legal so is blood doping. What difference is there between artificially infusing the blood with saline and infusing it with oxygen? Both are cheating. You are artificially increasing the body's capacity to hold an essential nutrient to improve performance.