Spoon23 took the words right out of my mouth!
Now I'm supposed to defend Floyd?

Sorry but its up to you to understand what dehydrated state means. That is step one.
What I'm saying is that FLoyd, Ellerbe and Dr Ariza requested for an IV due to dehydration. USADA said that Floyd requested this IV, right?
So its up to YOU to prove that Floyd was in the correct dehydrated state to have received approval of a retroactive TUE and explain this to us.
You have brought up clinical signs but not the state of dehydration. YOU cannot be requesting retroactive TUE if Floyd was just mildly dehydrated.
Floyd said he was severely dehydrated but that is really, irrelevant here.
Now I'm supposed to defend Floyd?


Sorry but its up to you to understand what dehydrated state means. That is step one.
What I'm saying is that FLoyd, Ellerbe and Dr Ariza requested for an IV due to dehydration. USADA said that Floyd requested this IV, right?
So its up to YOU to prove that Floyd was in the correct dehydrated state to have received approval of a retroactive TUE and explain this to us.
You have brought up clinical signs but not the state of dehydration. YOU cannot be requesting retroactive TUE if Floyd was just mildly dehydrated.
Floyd said he was severely dehydrated but that is really, irrelevant here.
Comment