who among suspected PED user got away the most: Pacquaio, Mayweather or Marquez?

[Zaroku]

Lol so many fl0mos using their critical delusional mind to analyze me..

This is what they actually see.. No drugs needed for them to get here

Read between the lines and lies, they all cheated!

You need another poll, maybe something like, have my threads changed any minds globally??
Your campaign may or may not be working!
Please don't misinterpret views for agreement! You them to make broad generalizations without actually verifying percentage of people who agree with you.

[travestyny]

Floyd settled huge amount of money out of court because they provided Pac 2k plus of documents yeah Floyd and his genius fans logic.

Well well well, look who it is. Another pacroach with no idea what he is talking about. The case was about defamation, not whether Floyd failed 3 tests.


You seem to have stopped talking **** about the time necessary for IV rehydration. Did you admit you were wrong about 250ml needing to be delivered in 2-4 hours yet?

Did you admit that an IV can't cause someone to bleed from their pelvis? lol.

Bow out, homey. You are a straight up fool.

[Rath]

Well well well, look who it is. Another pacroach with no idea what he is talking about. The case was about defamation, not whether Floyd failed 3 tests.


You seem to have stopped talking **** about the time necessary for IV rehydration. Did you admit you were wrong about 250ml needing to be delivered in 2-4 hours yet?

Did you admit that an IV can't cause someone to bleed from their pelvis? lol.

Bow out, homey. You are a straight up fool.

Floyd was not settling the case of "defamation" when the 3 failed test was not brought up yet was he?

genius floyd fans and their logic.

by the way were you able to provide the phantom paramedic and proof of floyd's dehydration yet?

250 ml in 2-4 hours was not my idea but the doctor.

750 ml of who knows what soulution in 15 minutes was for rehydration LOL

you gave an example of a woman trying to cure hang over to prove your point.

the issue is the nose, yet you are providing proof about the ear LOL

bow out straight up fool you said LOL

[travestyny]

Floyd was not settling the case of "defamation" when the 3 failed test was not brought up yet was he?

I thought no papers were delivered at all because it was settled, according to Hauser's original accusation . It was settled after 2,695 pages were already delivered. Hauser proven WRONG.

by the way were you able to provide the phantom paramedic and proof of floyd's dehydration yet?

You do realize that this information is considered confidential. Why don't you tell Pacquaio's counsel to get the information subpoenaed. They seem hesitant. I wonder why...?

250 ml in 2-4 hours was not my idea but the doctor.

You probably misunderstood what you were reading because you can't read very well. You also said an IV caused a woman to bleed out from her pelvis. lol

750 ml of who knows what soulution in 15 minutes was for rehydration LOL

No one said he had it in 15 minutes, but then again you have poor comprehension skills, don't you?

you gave an example of a woman trying to cure hang over to prove your point.

I also gave an example of it being strictly for dehydration, but you conveniently bowed out when I gave that information. The point was always that 250ml doesn't require 2-4 hours, but you couldn't understand that.

Again, the questions remain:
DO YOU ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG ABOUT 250ml REQUIRING 2-4 HOURS?

DO YOU ADMIT THAT YOU WERE A FOOL TO BELIEVE AN IV CAN CAUSE SOMEONE TO BLEED OUT FROM THEIR PELVIS?

Step up!

[Rath]

I thought no papers were delivered at all because it was settled, according to Hauser's original accusation . It was settled after 2,695 pages were already delivered. Hauser proven WRONG.

genius floyd fan patented deflection technique on display here.

did he or did he not settled out of court before the 3 failed tests were requested?

simple question demands simple asnwer.

You do realize that this information is considered confidential. Why don't you tell Pacquaio's counsel to get the information subpoenaed. They seem hesitant. I wonder why...?

providing a paramedic's identity and proving floyd was dehydrated is confidential now?


You probably misunderstood what you were reading because you can't read very well. You also said an IV caused a woman to bleed out from her pelvis. lol

look above and see my first reply. you have the guts to tell me who can't understand what he's reading?

a classic example: that bleeding from the pelvic patient was on the link you provided LOL see how genius you are?


No one said he had it in 15 minutes, but then again you have poor comprehension skills, don't you?

then provide how long Floyd finished 750 ml of IV or you gonna deflect again using it's "confidential"?

I also gave an example of it being strictly for dehydration, but you conveniently bowed out when I gave that information. The point was always that 250ml doesn't require 2-4 hours, but you couldn't understand that.

maybe dela hoya's case would be fit to give as an example, both elite prize fighters and both says they'd IVed because of dehydration.

how much was dela hoya's IV solution and how long did he finished it.


Again, the questions remain:
DO YOU ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG ABOUT 250ml REQUIRING 2-4 HOURS?

DO YOU ADMIT THAT YOU WERE A FOOL TO BELIEVE AN IV CAN CAUSE SOMEONE TO BLEED OUT FROM THEIR PELVIS?

Step up!

you haven't admitted your mistakes yet and deflected the issue and yet you want me to be like GTTofAK you genius gentleman one?

LOL

[travestyny]

genius floyd fan patented deflection technique on display here.

did he or did he not settled out of court before the 3 failed tests were requested?

simple question demands simple asnwer.

Your question makes no sense for the simple fact that information about 3 failed tests were not requested, idiot. It was a request for medical records, of which USADA provided 2,695 pages of documents. There were no 3 failed tests. There is no such thing as an inadvertent use waiver. So did Hauser, who said inadvertent use waivers were given, and also said no documents were delivered, give false information? Yes or no?

providing a paramedic's identity and proving floyd was dehydrated is confidential now?

He already said he was dehydrated.
The paramedic's identity is on the TUE application, and yes it is confidential. Any more questions?

look above and see my first reply. you have the guts to tell me who can't understand what he's reading?

a classic example: that bleeding from the pelvic patient was on the link you provided LOL see how genius you are?

YOU read the information and interpreted it incorrectly. The patient was a trauma patient who was bleeding from her pelvis. YOU said that was caused by the IV. That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard of, and you know it. So answer the question. Can an IV cause bleeding from a person's pelvis? Yes or no?

then provide how long Floyd finished 750 ml of IV or you gonna deflect again using it's "confidential"?

I don't have to tell you that because I don't have that information. It was YOU who said it would take 2-4 hours for 250ml. SO WERE YOU RIGHT OR WRONG. Man up and admit it. Stop being a b*tch. You were wrong and you know it.

maybe dela hoya's case would be fit to give as an example, both elite prize fighters and both says they'd IVed because of dehydration.

how much was dela hoya's IV solution and how long did he finished it.

Not sure what you are getting at. Once again, YOU said it takes 2-4 hours for 250ml of IV fluid to be delivered. Were you right or wrong? It doesn't matter if the person is a boxer or not. Are you trying to say that it would take a different amount of time based on if the person is a professional boxer or not? How many more idiotic statements are you going to make? Really.

you haven't admitted your mistakes yet and deflected the issue and yet you want me to be like GTTofAK you genius gentleman one?
LOL

Don't know of any mistakes I've made. The only thing I recall is you trying to say I made a mistake by editing my post yourself, you clown. That should be a ban worthy offense.

So again:
DO YOU ADMIT YOU WERE WRONG ABOUT 250ml REQUIRING 2-4 HOURS?

DO YOU ADMIT THAT YOU WERE A FOOL TO BELIEVE AN IV CAN CAUSE SOMEONE TO BLEED OUT FROM THEIR PELVIS?

I know why you can't answer.

[Lester Tutor]

What is the name of crime scene investigator that found the OJ Simpson's glove? Perhaps that investigator took the glove to the cleaners and it shrunk..

[ADP02]

GOLD! Hahaha

ADP02 can you send me the video of Floyd saying some people use pedialyte I use IV. That's incriminating in itself.

Reporter was asking Floyd why did he have to take an IV. To justify the IV, Floyd starts saying that other athletes use some other ways such as taking Pedialyte

It's at the 25 second mark of the video

[Spoon23]

Reporter was asking Floyd why did he have to take an IV. To justify the IV, Floyd starts saying that other athletes use some other ways such as taking Pedialyte

It's at the 25 second mark of the video

Man that's enough grounds to hang someone of guilt.

Ultimate fraud.

[ADP02]

Even though I require you to ackowledge the word or to continue our discussion, I'm temporarily granting you an exemption to allow you to confirm a simple statement.


Asthma is a historically chronic illness - when someone experiences an asthma attack that would make it an acute medical condition.


Can you agree with that statement?

I have already experienced this.

When something is chronic and you have medication then you would check to see if the medication is a banned substance or not. If what you have is chronic then you would definitely know it way beforehand.

Many years ago, my doctor prescribed a couple of inhalers. So these 2 pumps should be already declared with the ADO since I required them on an ongoing basis. At one point in time, my attack was so severe that the inhalers were useless. I went to the hospital. They advised me that I should stay there overnight for treatments. Now they had me on a ventilating machine and gave me some other substances. SO to say that I would have taken those substances before letting the ADO know about it.

The above is all cool. When its a significant health risk then it should be all good. Its considered an emergency type situation. WADA states that these situations and the need for retroactive TUEs are uncommon but they are pointing out that they can happen.

I had already mentioned this on several occasions.