That's debateable. Considering Hopkins was at his best as a middleweight and Kovalev at light heavy. There's a good chance he wpuld beat him at any age. Even though I think he'd have a much tougher time with the Hopkins that fought Tarver than the one he fought.
As for your triangle theory, its a reach, and that's puttinf it mildly. Triangle theories are pretty meaningless in boxing. Being a supposed former fighter and long-time fight fan, I'd figured you'd know that. Yours is even more ridiculous considering you're using a sparring session. Rumor has it, Paul Spadafora got the best of Floyd in a sparring session. How you think that would turn out in a real fight? And if Kovalev is so easy for GGG, why not move up to light heavy and fight him?
BTW, the middleweight Hopkins would have ****d GGG.
As for your triangle theory, its a reach, and that's puttinf it mildly. Triangle theories are pretty meaningless in boxing. Being a supposed former fighter and long-time fight fan, I'd figured you'd know that. Yours is even more ridiculous considering you're using a sparring session. Rumor has it, Paul Spadafora got the best of Floyd in a sparring session. How you think that would turn out in a real fight? And if Kovalev is so easy for GGG, why not move up to light heavy and fight him?
BTW, the middleweight Hopkins would have ****d GGG.
Comment