Comments Thread For: BoxingScene.com's 2015 Fighter of the Year
Collapse
-
I haven't mentioned any of Klitschko's losses in this thread. Then you call me a fanboy with a picture of Fury in your sig lol. THEN you say 2015 Pacquiao who was coming off of a domination of Algieri (EDIT: and an easy win over Bradley to avenge a robbery) is not harder to beat than a Klitschko who struggled to look good against Jennings.
I'm seriously outta here. You're bugging the **** out.Last edited by doom_specialist; 12-30-2015, 05:05 AM.Comment
-
He11 i have Floyd Mayweather jr as the Fighter of THIS Decade when u consider the caliber of the opponents he has defeated the last few yrs. In the next 4yrs, no one will beat as much accomplished fighters as Mayweather has. Establishing hinswlf the best at WW and SWW simultaneously while he dominated more than half of said decade. And just hard as it was for ppl to accept the fact and outcome that FLOYD BEAT PAC and won Fighter of the Year 2015, so shall it be 4yrs from now..cant wait lol
The other candidates had big yrs, big wins but Bad Jack had the biggest yr and came the farthest...noq hes established among the top at SMW..big fights loom ahead and nobody can deny he deserves it bcuz hes earned it the proper way.Last edited by wlliam; 12-30-2015, 05:18 AM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Maybe because he also lost to Marquez?
Maybe because he hasn't looked destructive in 5 years? Or hasn't knocked anyone out in 5 years? Has had close fights, been knocked down and hurt.
Maybe because Klitschko had barely been touched in that time, undefeated for 10 years, no wars, no knockdowns and no losses. Beat almost every contender in his division and held 4 belts.Comment
-
No i mistook you for the other dude.I haven't mentioned any of Klitschko's losses in this thread. Then you call me a fanboy with a picture of Fury in your sig lol. THEN you say 2015 Pacquiao who was coming off of a domination of Algieri (EDIT: and an easy win over Bradley to avenge a robbery) is not harder to beat than a Klitschko who struggled to look good against Jennings.
I'm seriously outta here. You're bugging the **** out.
Oh Algieri? Well I get you rest your case then didn't you?
His win over Bradley wasn't easy.
He struggled to look good Jennings yes. Still won 10 rounds in that fight.Comment
-
It's as simple as that? According to who?
That's just crazy man. Klit looked way more shot and easy to beat than Pacquiao did. Not only that, but Pac had come off some impressive wins against better opposition, and had looked better than Klit in those too.
Klit lost that fight more than anyone won it. It was a tragic, awful, farce of a fight in what was surely among the very worst ever title fights in history. Fury looked amateurish and bad, but Klit was an embarrassment of a heavyweight champ frankly. There was no action, no clean punching, no clean fighting, a whole lot of scrappy mauling and wrestling, neither guy took the fight to the other and whatever skill both had was not evident at any point in the fight that night. Klit landed 52 total punches. Fifty two punches in a 12 round, unified heavyweight title fight. That's four punches per round. That is utterly abysmal.
However you look at it, Pac/Floyd was ten times the fight and they were ten times the fighters in comparison in every way, shape and form.Comment
-
We're going to act like the heavyweight division isn't basura now huh?Maybe because he also lost to Marquez?
Maybe because he hasn't looked destructive in 5 years? Or hasn't knocked anyone out in 5 years? Has had close fights, been knocked down and hurt.
Maybe because Klitschko had barely been touched in that time, undefeated for 10 years, no wars, no knockdowns and no losses. Beat almost every contender in his division and held 4 belts.
I've got no issues with anyone giving Fury the fighter of the year award, but trying to make Wlad out to be a better fighter than Manny is a joke.Comment
Comment