Comments Thread For: BoxingScene.com's 2015 Fighter of the Year

[doom_specialist]

Beating a greater fighter when he's past his best means less. Especially when he's lost a couple of fights and looked bad in others.

Fury beat the heavyweight champion of 10 years. A guy they said could beat Muhammad Ali with one arm tied behind his back.

Klitschko is clearly a greater win than Pacquiao 2015.

Klitschko who is pushing 40 years old, and obviously way past his best years (couldn't even score a KD on Jennings) is clearly greater than the consensus 2nd greatest fighter of this era, who was riding a dominant 3 fight win streak going into his fight with Mayweather? 38 year old Mayweather defeating this fighter is outweighed by 27 year old Fury beating a 39 year old guy on his way out the door? If you say so lol

[LacedUp]

bro pac has recnetly beat number 3 or 4 p4p bradley..klit still doesnt own a p4p win to this day!..he went 12 rounds with jennings and we see wat a newcomer did to jennings..
fact is fans are more excieted about pac's next fight than klits..bc they know klit is a stiff..who has no confidence in himself

Yes he also lost to Bradley. Should have lost to Marquez twice.

He clearly was past his prime and regardless what any list says, bradley was never top 3-4 P4P. EVER

That's true. Pacquiao is a way more exciting fighter than klitschko. But he was never as dominant in any division.

[Johnwoo8686]

Yeah I forgot that time 3 fights ago where Klitschko was put to sleep for 5 minutes.

Don't care which was the bigger fight. Fury beat the undisputed heavyweight champion of the world on the top of his game, who beat everyone convincingly in the past 2 eras.

Mayweather beat Pacquiao - A great champion. But in recent fights what happened?

Flattened by Marquez
Lost to Bradley
Should have lost to Marquez in III

Those are FACTS

No they aren't facts lmao. Klitsckho was NEVER undisputed. So right there you have your facts wrong. Deontay Wilder has the lineal belt which means Klitsckho was only the unified champ. And Lets be real, Bradley never really beat Pacquiao. Pac was robbed. His only clear loss in the past decade was to Marquez who took FOUR goddamn tries to do it. And Vlad was never universally recognized as pound for pound the best fighter in the world the way Floyd and Manny were at points in their individual careers. Vlad's career had never reached the heights that Manny Pacquiao's had. Pacquiao was the bigger win, no question.

[LacedUp]

Klitschko who is pushing 40 years old, and obviously way past his best years (couldn't even score a KD on Jennings) is clearly greater than the consensus 2nd greatest fighter of this era, who was riding a dominant 3 fight win streak going into his fight with Mayweather? 38 year old Mayweather defeating this fighter is outweighed by 27 year old Fury beating a 39 year old guy on his way out the door? If you say so lol

Listen. beating Klitschko was a not only a bigger achievement than beating Pacquiao, it was way bigger.

Simple as that.

[LacedUp]

No they aren't facts lmao. Klitsckho was NEVER undisputed. So right there you have your facts wrong. Deontay Wilder has the lineal belt which means Klitsckho was only the unified champ. And Lets be real, Bradley never really beat Pacquiao. Pac was robbed. His only clear loss in the past decade was to Marquez who took FOUR goddamn tries to do it. And Vlad was never universally recognized as pound for pound the best fighter in the world the way Floyd and Manny were at points in their individual careers. Vlad's career had never reached the heights that Manny Pacquiao's had. Pacquiao was the bigger win, no question.

Ok pal.

FYI those are opinions.

[doom_specialist]

Listen. beating Klitschko was a not only a bigger achievement than beating Pacquiao, it was way bigger.

Simple as that.

Opinion without fact. Simple as that. I'm over this discussion.

[Johnwoo8686]

Ok pal.

FYI those are opinions.

Clearly you dont know the difference between a fact and an opinion lol. You said Klitsckho was undisputed and you were DEAD wrong. And as for Pac "losing to Bradley" we all know Bradley didn't actually beat Pacquiao.

Barely anyone even spoke about the Fury fight outside of hardcore boxing fans while Mayweather Pacquiao was a global phenomenon. Floyd is the fighter of the year man, accept it.

[LacedUp]

Clearly you dont know the difference between a fact and an opinion lol. You said Klitsckho was undisputed and you were DEAD wrong. And as for Pac "losing to Bradley" we all know Bradley didn't actually beat Pacquiao.

Barely anyone even spoke about the Fury fight outside of hardcore boxing fans while Mayweather Pacquiao was a global phenomenon. Floyd is the fighter of the year man, accept it.

that's not the fact and opinion I was referring to

Wilder has the lineal title. WTF does that even mean dude? You're a Mayweather fanboy - no one else would sit here and discuss a man who won a belt off freaking Bermane Stiverne to big up a win.

[LacedUp]

Opinion without fact. Simple as that. I'm over this discussion.

Ah I get it, you're that special kind of ******.

Overlooking the number of facts I have already mentioned in this thread to back up my opinion.

"klitschko nearly 40 doe"

"Pacquiao only 36"

[doom_specialist]

Ah I get it, you're that special kind of ******.

Overlooking the number of facts I have already mentioned in this thread to back up my opinion.

"klitschko nearly 40 doe"

"Pacquiao only 36"

Mad because you lost, so now you're just going the ad hominem route? Got ya. Insult all you like, but facts don't change. Pacquiao is greater than Klitschko lol.

"Pacquiao got knocked out in 2012, but it counts in 2015 doe"

"Klitschko 39 but he in his prime doe. He had all the belts doe"

Fury isn't fighter of the year. No need to be a female about it.