You questioned the reason people offer step-aside fees, and I responded. I questioned the reason he's accepting them if his priority is the belt. I think we've arrived at the conclusion that the belt isn't the priority. That's all she wrote.
wanting the belt and wanting canelo are not mutually exclusive positions though
wanting the belt and wanting canelo are not mutually exclusive positions though
in the minds of the GGG hate squad they ARE mutually exclusive. You must want either money, exposure, or the belts. It is impossible to want all 3 at the same time. lol
in the minds of the GGG hate squad they ARE mutually exclusive. You must want either money, exposure, or the belts. It is impossible to want all 3 at the same time. lol
it's a shame when people play dumb to score cheap points
If he forced Canelo to do his mandatory in May 2016, I think Canelo would have just vacated.
of course he would have. And then the hate squad would have been like "ggg paper champ dont want canelo fight doe" and "see, ggg would rather win titles in boardroom doe" blah blah blah blah blah.
If he forced Canelo to do his mandatory in May 2016, I think Canelo would have just vacated.
And that would play nicely with the narrative that the belt is what they're after. Accepting step-aside money indicates they want more, and there's nothing wrong with that.
Originally posted by NEETzsche
your final sentence is a total non-sequitur
It actually isn't. I'm referring to more recent scenarios.
Tweet
Comment