Originally posted by Derranged
View Post
1. Not good
2. Have network/promotional issues
3. Had better financial opportunities presented to them
4. A combination of the above
5. All of the above
Why would Sturm fight Golovkin when he can make money fighting anyone in Germany for more money? He's not good enough to beat GGG. Dude is a fringe contender at best who is just making a living. Someone else mentioned N'Dam?


Martinez was shot and had been shot for years. His knees were deteriorated and he was trying to cash out. Who would you rather cash out with: Cotto or GGG? And after seeing the Cotto fight, who in their right mind would want to see GGG vs. Martinez? Do you hate Sergio that much?
Quillin and Jacobs? If he can fight them he could have fought Lara. But for some reason, those 2 are pathetic duckers and Lara has Haymon problems. And besides, they are average fringe contenders.
Miguel Cotto. Dude isn't even a real middleweight and never was one. He capitalized on an opportunity and used his name for earnings. Who the hell would want to see GGG vs. Cotto? We already know the outcome. Cotto's punches were like love taps against Canelo because he can't **** with these bigger opponents.
This is nothing more than fighters making business decisions which GGG and his team have constantly done as well. He didn't move up to fight Ward because:
1. He's not good enough to beat Ward
2. He has better financial opportunities in line for him
3. The risk doesn't add up to the reward
Where people disagree is not about how good he is, but what we want to see him do.
1. Group 1 wants to see him stay at 160, collect belts and beat the Andy Lee's of the world.
2. Group 2 wants to see how his skills stack up against other fighters who are also pound for pound caliber.
That's all there is to it. There is nothing wrong with being in either group. But let's not use business decisions to pity GGG when he does the same damn thing himself.
Comment