Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How can Canelo be P4P #1?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    He's top 5, whether you like it or not. #1 is pushing it though.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by thecomedian2 View Post
      You don´t know **** about Boxing.
      Canelo has clearly fought better and beat better opponents than Roman

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by SeekDaGreat View Post
        He's top 5, whether you like it or not. #1 is pushing it though.
        Then who is number 1, it has to be Canelo its the only one that makes most sense.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by SeekDaGreat View Post
          He's top 5, whether you like it or not. #1 is pushing it though.
          definitely not top 5 what the heck??? canelo's best wins (trout, lara and cotto) are debatable. he barely even beat cotto. trout fight was very close (easily a draw). and many had lara beating canelo.

          not to mention he's fighting all of his fights at 155. what kind of top 5 p4p'er does that???? making up their own weight class to fight in????? hahahahahahahah give me a break. canelo is all hype and completely overrated.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by SeekDaGreat View Post
            He's top 5, whether you like it or not. #1 is pushing it though.
            It's not a question of liking it or not. I always try to be objective. Canelo has just not done anything to deserve being in the P4P top 5. In no way should he be ranked higher than guys like Golovkin, Kovalev, Ward, Fury, Pacquiao, etc.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Dr. Uncle View Post
              It's not a question of liking it or not. I always try to be objective. Canelo has just not done anything to deserve being in the P4P top 5. In no way should he be ranked higher than guys like Golovkin, Kovalev, Ward, Fury, Pacquiao, etc.
              lol He's definitely done more than Golovkin, thats for sure

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
                Then who is number 1, it has to be Canelo its the only one that makes most sense.
                I think Boxrec uses a point system to set their p4p list, the better opponents you beat the more points you get, the higher you are on the p4p list. Most other lists are objective.

                Comment


                • #18
                  who has him as p4p#1????

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Red Cyclone View Post
                    Boxrec do and I think he deserves it, deserves it much more than Roman Gonzalez.
                    lol at Boxrec no one goes by that list

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Dr. Uncle View Post
                      It's not a question of liking it or not. I always try to be objective. Canelo has just not done anything to deserve being in the P4P top 5. In no way should he be ranked higher than guys like Golovkin, Kovalev, Ward, Fury, Pacquiao, etc.
                      You don't get put into the P4P ratings for something you did 4 years ago buddy...

                      Maybe we could make an argument and say Rigondeaux should still be in the top 10 but even as a HUGE Golovkin fan I'm well aware wins over Trout, Lara and Cotto are massive wins!
                      Canelo has been on a tear in the past few years my only complaint with him is he isn't inside the 154 limit but whatever he still beat those guys dude.

                      Who has Kovalev, GGG, Ward and so on beat in recent years in an active manner that tops those three mentioned, Canelo has fought the fights people like assumingly you would want him to fight and he can't catch a damn break!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP