Comments Thread For: Top Rank Hits Back at Al Haymon With Amended Complaint

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HanzGruber
    STRAPMEUP
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 29824
    • 1,069
    • 238
    • 81,632

    #71
    Originally posted by PAC-BOY
    Porter Thurman? Oh hell yes. Has every bit of the fire power potential to be fight of the year.
    No I mean for 2015 lol. Huck glowacki

    Comment

    • FeFist
      No.1
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 9251
      • 576
      • 357
      • 29,695

      #72
      Originally posted by AddiX
      It actually happens quite often, billion dollar deals get cut short by the gov't all the time because of the fact it Would form a future monopoly. You wouodnt know that because section 8 doesn't teach law, and your probably too cool to a read a damn newspaper once and awhile.
      If you had an understanding of what you were talking about, you would know why your argument fails to connect with itself.

      You are arguing that 'it doesn't have to be a monopoly yet, just creating an environment that would give himself a monopoly would be illegal and have asserted that it happens often because 'billion dollar deals get cut short by the gov't all the time because of the fact it would create a future monopoly.'

      What you presented is not an example of an illegal act, it is an example of the courts acting to prevent an illegal act. If it is determined that the mergers of a company would create a monopoly, the courts would act to prevent that. In order for the company to be punished, for an illegal act, the courts would have to show that they have created a monopoly.

      In the case of Al Haymon, he's not being judged on acts that he's yet to commit ergo it would need to be shown that his acts have created a monopoly.

      And judicial precedent has no standing here because this has never happened before you fcking ******.
      The exact matter does not need to happen. You have made the argument that it is down to whether or not the government cares; however the deciding factor is the decision reached by the courts which is determined by statute and case law.

      Comment

      • aboutfkntime
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 47366
        • 1,631
        • 3,563
        • 391,308

        #73
        Originally posted by -Kev-
        Lol TR complaining that PBC are airing too many fights and have contracts with SpikeTV, Bounce, NBC, etc OMFG that's comical. It has to be 105 pages of comedy

        Al Haymon's reaction to Top Rank's second complaint:

        Comment

        • saintpat
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2013
          • 1289
          • 70
          • 12
          • 27,892

          #74
          Judge's final verdict: 118-110 in favor of Haymon.

          Comment

          • Cinci Champ
            And Still!!!
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2012
            • 9374
            • 301
            • 139
            • 23,582

            #75
            Originally posted by Eastcoast
            Likely things such as Chavez Jr. posting pictures of his checks with Haymon's name on them. You typically get paid by your promoter, not adviser.
            no u dont ur manager takes care of the money

            Comment

            • Cinci Champ
              And Still!!!
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jul 2012
              • 9374
              • 301
              • 139
              • 23,582

              #76
              Originally posted by Rich2123
              Yep. As someone who works with lawyers but is in no way shape or form a lawyer (I do IT work), this would be my best guess to what he's doing. He knows Waddell and Reed could get cold feet if their name keeps coming up in lawsuits. In a lot of cases like this, they just want to keep them busy in court until the investors decide "to heck with this" and walk away. It wouldn't be the first time this happened.

              It might work. Arums got millions of dollars, he might as well strike back at the company that's trying to run him out of business.
              they cant be named anymore thats already been settled they are fine. also they for sure planned to have this they knew arum would kick and scream

              Comment

              • Eastcoast
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2014
                • 8639
                • 288
                • 0
                • 15,501

                #77
                Originally posted by Cinci Champ
                no u dont ur manager takes care of the money
                Really? Is that why Floyd's checks were made out by Golden Boy?

                Comment

                • PAC-BOY
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 55380
                  • 4,125
                  • 5,352
                  • 157,380

                  #78
                  Originally posted by HanzGruber
                  No I mean for 2015 lol. Huck glowacki
                  Oh. Yeah that was surely a foty candidate. Brutal shlt there .

                  Comment

                  • MC Hammer
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 3533
                    • 149
                    • 95
                    • 29,084

                    #79
                    Originally posted by AddiX
                    No, I'm just tired of reading BS from people who don't have a clue what there talking about.

                    These lawyers are expecting to be fighting this for years, it will cost millions and millions of dollars in lawyer fees, not to mention countless resources and time they can't get back.

                    They won't even take these cases unless they are pretty sure they have a shot to win or at least reach settlement.

                    But yeah, MC Hammer, we should listen to him, he knows what he's talking about.
                    They took a case against Waddell Reed and had 0 shot at anything according the judge, so it seems like they aren't all that sure to begin with.

                    These lawyers take any case presented because they get paid regardless of the result. If Arum wants to be ****** and waste money on a frivolous lawsuit, the lawyers will have no problem taking it from him.

                    On another note, all that tightness isn't good for your blood pressure. That's how you get hypertension lmao

                    Comment

                    • MC Hammer
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2011
                      • 3533
                      • 149
                      • 95
                      • 29,084

                      #80
                      Originally posted by killakali
                      lol Haymon charges most of his fighters 20% while sanctioning bodies charge 3% he's in this for profit not for charity smh at this post.

                      Haymon is paying fighters inflated purses from this war chest because the more he pays the more goes in his pockets. He's tasking money from the investors and putting it straight in his pocket. No conflict of interest there when he's controlling the networks and the investor money.
                      I've read 10%, and 0 if they make less than 100K. At least according to the Playboy article that came out about Haymon.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP