Originally posted by Isaac Clarke
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How is this guy a legend?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by LeonSpinxMwfpce View PostNever moved up, and didn't fight for a title until his 50th fight, didn't win a championship until his 54th fight.
How is this even possible to call a guy like this legendary? In his 45th fight, he fought a guy with 38 losses. In his 39th fight he fought a guy with 11 wins and 26 losses. In his 38th fight, he fought a guy with just 11 fights. In his 35th fight, he fought a guy with one single fight, a loss.
he is a true warrior, in every sense of the word....
try reviewing his epic fights...
i won't say against who? you should know by now..
Comment
-
Some people know nothing about boxing.
Hagler was one of the best 160 fighters ever!
He never was stopped and was only knocked down once.
Have you even watched the Hearns fight? The 1st round is one the best rounds ever.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr.Fantastic View PostA guy that is considered one of the best 135 pounders ever was in a great fight with a MW? Damn! Legend!
Comment
-
Very solid resume and passes the eye test. He is an all-time great.
The problem is that people have become too into playing the stat game, but have very little knowledge of the fighters, scene and culture of those before them.
When you actually analyze the film available from let's say '76 til the end of his career it becomes abundantly clear why he is rated and regarded so highly.
Comment
-
So why is he given such a pass for his record up until he was a champion? Would you a have been saying after fight 35, "he really needs to fight someone elite, or move up already, the division is weak".
I see your double standards, and I stomp on them.
If you wanna say people avoided Hagler, fine. I agree. But just be consistent when you assess GGGs career, because it's the same thing going on.
Comment
-
I'm confused how anyone wouldn't consider him as a legend
He had some mismatches but so does every other boxer and I don't think it matters when he had those bad match ups, Marvin not only fought a fan pleasing style but he also beat a lot of the top guys doing it that way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LeonSpinxMwfpce View PostSo why is he given such a pass for his record up until he was a champion? Would you a have been saying after fight 35, "he really needs to fight someone elite, or move up already, the division is weak".
I see your double standards, and I stomp on them.
If you wanna say people avoided Hagler, fine. I agree. But just be consistent when you assess GGGs career, because it's the same thing going on.
That's them being idiots though we all know that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DeadLikeMe View PostBut you do see Pacquiao and De La Hoya among them? The fact they both got sonned by Floyd only makes this funnier.
Originally posted by STAX ON DECK View Postthe dumbest thread ever??
mr spastastic cant even talk about boxing without bringing up race in one way or another
Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Postnobody in this thread said he was... you are just jumping to conclusions.
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostFat old middleweight Duran would beat the living hell out of everyone at middleweight besides maybe Golovkin. And I certainly wouldn't count him out against Golovkin.
Comment
Comment