New Names Up For HOF Vote

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • crold1
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 6354
    • 328
    • 122
    • 19,304

    #51
    Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
    Yeah, benn, eubank and Camacho would all get my vote
    Camacho belongs. First ballot? I try to reserve that for blow away obvious top three on the ballot guys. Again, I expect him to get in.

    Comment

    • Sugar Adam Ali
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2013
      • 27630
      • 970
      • 1,174
      • 82,827

      #52
      Originally posted by crold1
      Camacho belongs. First ballot? I try to reserve that for blow away obvious top three on the ballot guys. Again, I expect him to get in.
      Who else is on the ballot?

      Comment

      • crold1
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 6354
        • 328
        • 122
        • 19,304

        #53
        Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
        Who else is on the ballot?
        Here was last year's list; everyone carried over except Mancini, Hamed and Bowe so these guys plus Camacho, Yuri, and Sot.

        http://www.bwaa.us/2014/10/10/2015-i...fame-nominees/

        Comment

        • saintpat
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2013
          • 1289
          • 70
          • 12
          • 27,892

          #54
          Originally posted by therealpugilist
          Genaro Hernandez was a better fighter than Gatti and Graziano


          Im a fan of winners, and I actually boxed so I don't give kudos for taking beatings


          Being in a fight of the year is great but its also the caliber of fighters in the fight that brings the significance

          I love exciting fights but Its not fair to fighters who accomplished more in the ring, meaning titles and defenses, who are not in....to let someone one in because of " social significance and popularity"....its basically like you're saying they got in because they were exciting to watch and because of their race.

          Should Mickey Ward be in the hall of fame??? IMO not enough weight is put on accomplishment and too much on popularity and "social significance"

          Here is a short list of guys who were in exciting fights, but didn't have enough "popularity" and " social significance" but accomplished more and were better than McGuigan and Gatti.......

          Look at fighters like Roger Mayweather, Rocky Lockridge, Cornelious Boza Edwards, doezens of Asian champions in the lower weights like Yuri, Mexican great Gilberto Roman, etc


          Hernandez would beat Gatti and McGuigan if they wouldve fought...also Hernandez was lineal champion with several defenses and only lost to two hall of famers, ODLH and PBF


          Honestly Ray Mancini getting in was BS in my book, he was a good fighter but very popular but guys in his era who were better and accomplished more wont get in like the guys I mentioned
          "Only lost to" gets trumped by "who did he beat" in my book. He doesn't have the resume IMO. And I was a big fan.

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            BoxingScene Icon
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 49630
            • 5,053
            • 270
            • 104,043

            #55
            Originally posted by LacedUp
            I think boxing would be better of sticking to the one.

            Does anyone really count the others? I mean, sure the party looks nice and all, but I wouldn't consider myself a hall of famer if I was in the Nevada HOF or something like that.
            It is nothing like Nevada's Hall of Fame.

            The WBHF has been around longer than the IBHOF and was considered one of the two (along with the IBHOF) legitimate international HOF's.

            You know when people say Duran doesn't have a losing record against HOF'ers? That's because they include the WBHOF.

            WBHOF is/was legit.

            Comment

            • IronDanHamza
              BoxingScene Icon
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2009
              • 49630
              • 5,053
              • 270
              • 104,043

              #56
              Originally posted by crold1
              It's like being in Ring's old Hall. It's cool but it's not a thing anymore. For better or worse, the IBHOF is it
              It's nothing alike to that.

              It doesn't matter if they've stopped it now if you were inducted into the WBHOF you were considered a HOF'er that hasn't been deleted from history.

              If a new HOF starts, GBHF The global boxing hall of fame and the IBHOF shuts down do all of the IBHOF'ers cease to exist?

              Comment

              • LacedUp
                Still Smokin'
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 29171
                • 781
                • 381
                • 132,163

                #57
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                It is nothing like Nevada's Hall of Fame.

                The WBHF has been around longer than the IBHOF and was considered one of the two (along with the IBHOF) legitimate international HOF's.

                You know when people say Duran doesn't have a losing record against HOF'ers? That's because they include the WBHOF.

                WBHOF is/was legit.
                Maybe a wild comparison, but was just to get the point across.

                I honestly don't remember the last time someone quoted the WBHOF as a legit HOF to me. At least 5-6 years ago I even thought about it.

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 49630
                  • 5,053
                  • 270
                  • 104,043

                  #58
                  Originally posted by LacedUp
                  Maybe a wild comparison, but was just to get the point across.

                  I honestly don't remember the last time someone quoted the WBHOF as a legit HOF to me. At least 5-6 years ago I even thought about it.
                  Probably because they haven't had a Ballot in a few years.

                  Does that delete it's history?

                  If the IBHOF stops inducting donwe forget all their inductees?

                  WBHOF has existed before the IBHOF and was considered a legitimate international HOF for years, that doesn't change because it's no longer inducting.

                  If you're in the WBHOF you're a HOF'er.

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #59
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                    Probably because they haven't had a Ballot in a few years.

                    Does that delete it's history?

                    If the IBHOF stops inducting donwe forget all their inductees?

                    WBHOF has existed before the IBHOF and was considered a legitimate international HOF for years, that doesn't change because it's no longer inducting.

                    If you're in the WBHOF you're a HOF'er.
                    I suppose you have a point.

                    Any specific fighters that you know of that are in the WBHOF and not in IBHOF or vice versa?

                    Comment

                    • Cinci Champ
                      And Still!!!
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jul 2012
                      • 9376
                      • 301
                      • 139
                      • 23,582

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Mr.Fantastic
                      Waiting for several years is actually a good idea. Wouldn't surprise me if we see someone like Broner, Ward or Pavlik on there with the current standards.
                      comparing ward to pavlik and broner is a bit ridiculous

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP