Looks like Ward has signed a three fight deal with HBO at LIGHT HEAVYWEIGHT. So can we put this thread to bed now? Or is Golovkin now ducking a LHW?
Comments Thread For: Team Golovkin Will Want More Than 50% From Ward
Collapse
-
1) congratulations for awarding Gennady his first ever win over a top name
Ward actually beat Froch dumbass, he didn't just talk about it.
And, no..... beating old faded one-foot-out-the-door Froch is not as good as beating, prime on-top-of-his-game Froch.
Sorry to have to pull your knickers down again.Comment
-
If you're The MW champ, you're a MW, dumbfcuk.
ESPN, boxingscene, Ring, TBRB are all ******s, says a know nothing ****** fanboy from New Zealand lmaoComment
-
Only casual fans talk like that.
Only casual fans think that ABC belts mean anything.
Kid, the belt that you describe as " the most prestigious MW belt "..... does not rank Wladimir Klitschko in their top-10 at Heavyweight.
GTFOH !
Only a dopey casual fan would rank Cotto higher than Golovkin at 160.
The fact that those ABC sanctioning bodies have been unreliable for decades is disappointing, but the fact that you are not even aware of that fact is even more disappointing.
Good luck with your turd-polishing contest.Comment
-
Comment
-
If I was in Golovkins team, I would do the exact same thing.Ward can't even make 168! And on top of that he has not fought anyone in what has been several years now(Yes more than two is several), DAMN! Ward is basically a Light Heavy, go fight Stevenson or Kovalev!
If I was Golovkin's team, I would offer Ward 90/10 take it or leave it. (Since he shot down the 50/50 offer for the two to meet in the middle)
But if I was a Golovkin fan however, I would call that disgraceful bullshht.
But hey, whatever....Comment
-
I don't have a fucking clue what you are going on about there. You obviously have me confused with someone else who must also have tried to explain the relationship between weight limits and weight divisions to you.1) I understand the boxing landscape
2) I always use common-sense
You do neither of those things, which is why you continually look ******.
Firstly, the benefit of hindsight tells you that fight was not a welterweight contest..... two JWW's fought at 141, and then continued fighting at 140.
Only a fkn ****** would attempt to insist that fight was a welterweight contest.
Secondly..... 141, are you serious ? Stop being so ****** kid. And then you try to tell me that you are a boxing guy LMAO
Welters do not weigh 141, dont be so fkn ridiculous.
Thirdly, Schaeffer stated exactly why that fight was held at 141. They did not want it to be recognised as a title fight.
Stop being so ridiculous kid, and use some common-sense.
Here's how it works: WW is above 140lbs and below 147lbs. So a fight with a weight limit of 141lbs is at WW.
MW is above 154lbs and below 160lbs, so Cotto vs Canelo, at a catchweight of 155lbs will be a MW fight.
Even if you couldn't figure that out for yourself, I would have thought the fact that it is being billed as a world middleweight title fight would have been enough of a clue for anybody, even a ****wit like you.Comment
-
Read the post you replied to
I would also call you a fkn moron for calling Canelo a MW just because he fights JMW's at 155.
Smarten up.Comment
-
ESPN, boxingscene, Ring, TBRB, ******.Only casual fans talk like that.
Only casual fans think that ABC belts mean anything.
Kid, the belt that you describe as " the most prestigious MW belt "..... does not rank Wladimir Klitschko in their top-10 at Heavyweight.
GTFOH !
Only a dopey casual fan would rank Cotto higher than Golovkin at 160.
The fact that those ABC sanctioning bodies have been unreliable for decades is disappointing, but the fact that you are not even aware of that fact is even more disappointing.
Good luck with your turd-polishing contest.Comment
-
Stop wasting your time with the sheep ****er. The guy is an idiot. Toss him on your ignore list and move along. Or at the least stop quoting him. I'm getting tired of reading his quotes seeing as I put him on ignore just to save myself the aggravation of reading his posts.
Comment
Comment