Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In terms of actual wins, who has the better resume - DLH or Floyd?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Post
    oscar is more of a hero than floyd.

    his wins against whitaker and chavez sr >>>>> anything floyd has done

    not to mention he should have wins over a prime undefeated tito trinidad and shane mosley (who was drug cheating).
    So an old Chavez is better than an old PAC? Damn not much faith in your savior huh

    Comment


    • #12
      I would go with Mayweather on both counts. He beat Oscar at 154 and Oscar wasn't that far past prime. He has no losses and Oscar has many losses.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Pan-Africanist View Post
        He took a bigger risk fighting Hopkins. Other than that Oscar had a physical advantage over almost every fighter he got in the ring with.
        Put it this way. If ODLH would have went undefeated with his resume he would have gone down as easily top 5 maybe top 3 of all time IMO.

        Now Floyd who is undefeated in his carer is only 20th best of all time. Now that gives you an idea who's era is better.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by boxinghead530 View Post
          And he moved up as he got bigger. But every division he fought in he fought the very best every time out and he took on them in their prime. He never waited to let a fighter lose first before he fought them. Plus he fought in a way way way better era of welterweight than Floyd.
          You make some fair points.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by boxinghead530 View Post
            Put it this way. If ODLH would have went undefeated with his resume he would have gone down as easily top 5 maybe top 3 of all time IMO.

            Now Floyd who is undefeated in his carer is only 20th best of all time. Now that gives you an idea who's era is better.
            That's a simple minded way of looking at things. Every fight tells a story.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Vilicious86 View Post
              [IMG]http://media1.*****.com/media/rJ0w60oeJ3Im4/*****.gif[/IMG]
              My Fault still a little hung over

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
                Hung Over *** you lol

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Pan-Africanist View Post
                  That's a simple minded way of looking at things. Every fight tells a story.
                  How is that simple minded? You disagree with that assessment? How?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Pan-Africanist View Post
                    You make some fair points.
                    Right on my pan-African friend?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
                      So an old Chavez is better than an old PAC? Damn not much faith in your savior huh
                      yes because manny was KO'ed cold 3 fights earlier, and was nowhere near the same killer he was before because of it. also chavez sr was younger than the pac floyd beat u dunce. of course if floyd was the one who KO'ed manny in 2012 then i would say it would be better than chavez sr win. its simple to understand u dunce.
                      Last edited by Divine Hammer; 09-13-2015, 12:55 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP