Both well past their primes. Apparently dates don't mean anything to you.
Funny the fight with Whitiker was for the best fighter p4p let me know when Floyd faced a fighter that was a good as Sweat Pea ..The man wouldn't even fight Manny in 09 ! But hey I know Floyd fought the very best
LOL. Mayweather won 10 rounds in a row. Let me repeat that, Mayweather won 10 rounds in a row. Sure, Shane in his prime was fast as lightening - but timing neutralizes speed. We saw that in the Tszyu Judah and the Forest Mosley fights. Floyd boxes circles around Shane no matter when they would have fought...
lol, I ought to be more surprised that DLH is winning but idk. On NSB, Floyd is very polarizing.
Tito probably should have been a better win than anything on Floyd's resume but even if you give that to Oscar I don't know if you can really pick him.
This forum is a joke. The question was in "terms of WINS who has the better resume Oscar or Floyd?"
Floyd has wins over men who beat Oscar (Mosley, Pacquiao), men who beat the men who beat Oscar (Cotto over Mosley, Marquez over Pacquiao), and Oscar himself! Yet the idiots on this forum say Oscar has the better resume?
I don't get it . Especially when you include the fact that Oscar lost most of his big fights and got a few gift decisions it makes their logic even worse.
That's what hatred does. There's no logical explanation for DLH having better wins than Floyd, so the simps attempt to rewrite history just to marginalize Mayweather's better quality (and quantity) of wins.
Funny the fight with Whitiker was for the best fighter p4p let me know when Floyd faced a fighter that was a good as Sweat Pea ..The man wouldn't even fight Manny in 09 ! But hey I know Floyd fought the very best
Comment