Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In terms of actual wins, who has the better resume - DLH or Floyd?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
    Both well past their primes. Apparently dates don't mean anything to you.
    Funny the fight with Whitiker was for the best fighter p4p let me know when Floyd faced a fighter that was a good as Sweat Pea ..The man wouldn't even fight Manny in 09 ! But hey I know Floyd fought the very best

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
      40 yr old shane almost ktfo floyd

      floyd couldn't even hurt 2015 pac
      Almost?

      LOL. Mayweather won 10 rounds in a row. Let me repeat that, Mayweather won 10 rounds in a row. Sure, Shane in his prime was fast as lightening - but timing neutralizes speed. We saw that in the Tszyu Judah and the Forest Mosley fights. Floyd boxes circles around Shane no matter when they would have fought...

      Comment


      • Originally posted by imperial1 View Post
        yet you still can't answer who on Floyd's resume is better than Whitiker or Chavez
        Oscar de la Hoya...

        Comment


        • lol, I ought to be more surprised that DLH is winning but idk. On NSB, Floyd is very polarizing.

          Tito probably should have been a better win than anything on Floyd's resume but even if you give that to Oscar I don't know if you can really pick him.
          Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 09-14-2015, 05:49 PM.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Johnwoo8686 View Post
            This forum is a joke. The question was in "terms of WINS who has the better resume Oscar or Floyd?"

            Floyd has wins over men who beat Oscar (Mosley, Pacquiao), men who beat the men who beat Oscar (Cotto over Mosley, Marquez over Pacquiao), and Oscar himself! Yet the idiots on this forum say Oscar has the better resume?

            I don't get it . Especially when you include the fact that Oscar lost most of his big fights and got a few gift decisions it makes their logic even worse.
            That's what hatred does. There's no logical explanation for DLH having better wins than Floyd, so the simps attempt to rewrite history just to marginalize Mayweather's better quality (and quantity) of wins.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by imperial1 View Post
              Funny the fight with Whitiker was for the best fighter p4p let me know when Floyd faced a fighter that was a good as Sweat Pea ..The man wouldn't even fight Manny in 09 ! But hey I know Floyd fought the very best
              Wasn't PAC vs Floyd for the best pfp fighter?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
                Wasn't PAC vs Floyd for the best pfp fighter?
                It would only have counted if Pac won.

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP