Dariusz Michalczewski's single division run more impressive than Floyd or Roy's.

[b00g13man]

But his run was more impressive Richard. Look up his opponents for first. That is a serious list of big punching elite level fighters within the SAME DIVISION. Floyd and Roy jumped too much and was never the king pin in any division they fought in.

Stop embarrassing yourself guy.

[LacedUp]

But his run was more impressive Richard. Look up his opponents for first. That is a serious list of big punching elite level fighters within the SAME DIVISION. Floyd and Roy jumped too much and was never the king pin in any division they fought in.

That's not true at all.

Some of stuff people say these days.

[Eff Pandas]

I think boxing scene needs troll points like there are karma points. Would cut through the confusion of knowing if someone is just f#cking ****** or trolling.

[JasonBoxing]

That's not true at all.

Some of stuff people say these days.

How is that not true? I never said Dariuz is greater than Floyd or Roy, I said his SINGLE DIVISION run was more impressive than either Floyd's or Roy's.
What's wrong with that?

Name a division in which Roy or Floyd beat two dominating fighters like Montell Griffin and Virgil Hill? Roy beat Hopkins and Toney but that was at 160 and 168. Floyd beat a variety of good fighters but never in the same division. Griffin and Hill are easily the equal of Cotto/Corrales.(two of Floyd's best wins). I also find it amusing that everyone keep saying Hill and Griffin were two of Roy's 'big wins' but tend to forget Dariuz destroyed both as well.

[JasonBoxing]

Stop embarrassing yourself guy.

You embarrass yourself by not even knowing half of Dariuz's wins, but if you look CLOSELY? You will find that a lot of the wins Dariuz have is actually the same wins Roy has. So it can't be apples for one and oranges for the other. Either they are both elevated or they both devalue.

[LacedUp]

How is that not true? I never said Dariuz is greater than Floyd or Roy, I said his SINGLE DIVISION run was more impressive than either Floyd's or Roy's.
What's wrong with that?

Name a division in which Roy or Floyd beat two dominating fighters like Montell Griffin and Virgil Hill? Roy beat Hopkins and Toney but that was at 160 and 168. Floyd beat a variety of good fighters but never in the same division. Griffin and Hill are easily the equal of Cotto/Corrales.(two of Floyd's best wins). I also find it amusing that everyone keep saying Hill and Griffin were two of Roy's 'big wins' but tend to forget Dariuz destroyed both as well.

Roy was undisputed lightheavyweight champion and also beat Hill and Griffin also beat numerous other #1 contenders and champions in that division. Dariusz beat Hill and then fought Roy's leftovers and no hopers in Germany for the rest of his career.

Floyd beat Pacquiao, Mosley, Marquez, Hatton, Maidana etc etc at welterweight. Don't even get me started about his lower weight career. He's rightfully the top dog at WW and has been for years.

Simply no comparison at all. And you embarrass yourself by trying to claim otherwise.

[b00g13man]

You embarrass yourself by not even knowing half of Dariuz's wins, but if you look CLOSELY? You will find that a lot of the wins Dariuz have is actually the same wins Roy has. So it can't be apples for one and oranges for the other. Either they are both elevated or they both devalue.

Loooooooool. I get it. You're trying to be a comedian. Your material needs some work.

[imperial1]

Real shame those two never fought

[robertzimmerman]

Roys resume probably ranks higher but that's not endorsing Roy and saying he fought monsters. That guy has more holes in his resume than a block of cheese.

Floyd's is simply superior in every aspect.

How is Floyd's resume superior?

[robertzimmerman]

I never once said Dariuz is higher than Roy or Floyd in terms of ATG levels. I said his run was more impressive.

How on earth could it have been more impressive?

Break it down for me.