Dariusz Michalczewski's single division run more impressive than Floyd or Roy's.

[JasonBoxing]

Dariusz Michalczewski dominanted the LHW Division from 1991 to 2003. Overall a more impressive domination than Floyd/Roy's Division jumping. More impressive than Pacquiao's as well. Now is Dariusz higher ranked on the ATG Charts than the three? Of course not. I have all three in the top 30 and Dariusz from 50-70. But in terms of what's more impressive? Dariuz is.

[Pigeons]

Yawn........

[daggum]

i'll take quality over quantity and roy's opposition at 175 was better than dariusz's. tarver, reggie johnson, hill, harding, gonzalez, griffin, woods i'll take over hill, griffin(dubious), rochiagani(dubious), barber, and a bunch of unranked guys. also roy's level of performance was much better. dariusz in the first rochiagani fight was clearly outclassed and had to act his way to a dq win, the first griffin fight he lost every round until wobbling griffin and getting a uk stoppage. roy doesn't have any controversial wins on his resume.

[richardt]

Dariusz Michalczewski dominanted the LHW Division from 1991 to 2003. Overall a more impressive domination than Floyd/Roy's Division jumping. More impressive than Pacquiao's as well. Now is Dariusz higher ranked on the ATG Charts than the three? Of course not. I have all three in the top 30 and Dariusz from 50-70. But in terms of what's more impressive? Dariuz is.

What happened? Found the balls to show up after that long argument you and I had 3 months ago about how you said Broner was going to become a PFP ATG? He couldn't even get past Porter. And now you have the nerve to place DM loftier than Jones and Mayweather over his run? Damn you are a bleeding attention whore.

[just the facts]

Dariusz Michalczewski dominanted the LHW Division from 1991 to 2003. Overall a more impressive domination than Floyd/Roy's Division jumping. More impressive than Pacquiao's as well. Now is Dariusz higher ranked on the ATG Charts than the three? Of course not. I have all three in the top 30 and Dariusz from 50-70. But in terms of what's more impressive? Dariuz is.

Too ignorant for comment

[imperial1]

Have you seen the list of guys he fought after he beat Hill ? A who's who of who's !

[robertzimmerman]

Dariusz Michalczewski dominanted the LHW Division from 1991 to 2003. Overall a more impressive domination than Floyd/Roy's Division jumping. More impressive than Pacquiao's as well. Now is Dariusz higher ranked on the ATG Charts than the three? Of course not. I have all three in the top 30 and Dariusz from 50-70. But in terms of what's more impressive? Dariuz is.

Roy's resume at LHW alone is better than the whole of Dariusz's.

Quality over quantity.

[SplitSecond]

I'd have to check boxrec to be sure, but the way I remember it was this guy fighting Roy's leftovers and even losing to one.

[therealpugilist]

I'd have to check boxrec to be sure, but the way I remember it was this guy fighting Roy's leftovers and even losing to one.

That's the way it is and was....DM got hill before Roy did.... Roy beat the better overall comp in that era of Lt. Heavyweights and made it look easy until from age 27-34

[robertzimmerman]

i'll take quality over quantity and roy's opposition at 175 was better than dariusz's. tarver, reggie johnson, hill, harding, gonzalez, griffin, woods i'll take over hill, griffin(dubious), rochiagani(dubious), barber, and a bunch of unranked guys. also roy's level of performance was much better. dariusz in the first rochiagani fight was clearly outclassed and had to act his way to a dq win, the first griffin fight he lost every round until wobbling griffin and getting a uk stoppage. roy doesn't have any controversial wins on his resume.

Great post.