Can we agree that Floyd Mayweathers last 5 years of his career is overrated

[Divine Hammer]

"Remember Mayweather that was on the P4P list for almost 20 years and went unbeaten, he also easily beat the 2nd best fighter in the world, you know that drug cheat from the Philippines that didn't want to take the test for years."

Will be the more likely comments.

hahahahahahaha again u find urself lost in delusion. people are already willing to forget that joke "fight of the century" hahahahahahahaha give me a break.

and yah floyd went "unbeaten" (really he should have a couple of losses) because he AVOIDED BIG RISKS! that's what people will remember. get a clue seriously. avoided prime pacquiao (everyone knows that the 'fight of the century' was 6 years TOO LATE), avoided a prime cotto (a lot of boxing fans already admit that cotto wasn't the same after his beating against margarito and pacquiao), avoided a prime mosley (he was already considered past prime by manny boxing journalists when he fought cotto), avoided williams, avoided margarito, avoided dela hoya rematch, avoided martinez, avoiding GGG, hell he won't even fight khan hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

ur hero is a frrrrrraaaaauuuuddd. wake up from ur delusion. ur really acting liek a joke like ur hero.

[Divine Hammer]

They were rated top 5 fighters in the entire world, how can i overrate them? I didn't tell everyone what to think.

ur not critically thinking AT ALL. so what if they were ranked top 5????? were they at their best??? were they still seen as a big threat like they were in their prime??? NO and NOOOOOO. floyd waited until they accumulated more wear and tear and were way past their prime before he fought them. he carefully cherry picked everyone! get a clue. seriously it's not too hard to understand how overrated floyd's career has been. again, carlos baldomir was highly ranked but was he a big threat??? was he a career defining win that everyone will look back on and say "WOW!!!". hahahahahahahahahaha.

hahahahahahahaha all u can do is overrate ur punk hero's career and it's sad.

[Robbie Barrett]

because ur not critically thinking AT ALL. so what if they were ranked top 5????? were they at their best??? were they still seen as a big threat like they were in their prime??? NO and NOOOOOO. floyd waited until they accumulated more wear and tear and were way past their prime before he fought them. he carefully cherry picked everyone! get a clue.

hahahahahahahaha all u can do is overrate ur punk hero's career and it's sad.

The were top 5 fighters in the entire sport when Mayweather beat them, they were the best, it wasn't me that rated them that highly almost everyone did. Now we have a few butthurt fans (you included) trying to rewrite history and discredit the wins, but you're fighting an impossible fight. Mayweather his going down in history as one of the best and ahead of #48.

[Divine Hammer]

The were top 5 fighters in the entire sport when Mayweather beat them, they were the best, it wasn't me that rated them that highly almost everyone did. Now we have a few butthurt fans (you included) trying to rewrite history and discredit the wins, but you're fighting an impossible fight. Mayweather his going down in history as one of the best and ahead of #48.

hahahahahahahaha give me a break. this is getting boring now. u clearly believe they were great wins, right??? not because they were truly at the peak of their physical prime (which they weren't at all) but because people had them ranked at a certain number. u CONTINUE to overlook the fact that none of them were in their prime or considered nearly as big of a threat when they were actually in their prime hahhahahahahahahahahha. u are trapped in ur own delusion. again, this is the point of the whole thread!!! floyd's career is completely overrated because yes he beat guys who were ranked high BUT WHEN U LOOK AT IT AND ACTUALLY CRITICALLY THINK THEY WEREN'T GREAT WINS AT ALL!! seriously this is not hard to understand, but u keep looking at numbers and reading boxrec like a nerd.

step away from the numbers and boxrec and ACTUALLY USE UR BRAIN. just because someon is ranked #3 or is the lineal champ doesn't mean much unless u actually analyze it and use ur head.

[The Hammer]

Guerrero is a much smaller man than Mayweather.

So was JMM - Floyd couldn't even make the catch weight for Marquez.

Floyd waited until the smaller Pacquiao was shot to fight him.

Hatton had to move up a division to fight Floyd.

If Floyd wasn't a coward, he'd be fighting GGG at 154 for his WBC belt in that division, instead of facing a bum like Berto.

[Robbie Barrett]

hahahahahahahaha give me a break. this is getting boring now. u clearly believe they were great wins, right??? not because they were truly at the peak of their physical prime (which they weren't at all) but because people had them ranked at a certain number. u CONTINUE to overlook the fact that none of them were in their prime or considered nearly as big of a threat when they were actually in their prime hahhahahahahahahahahha. u are trapped in ur own delusion. again, this is the point of the whole thread!!! floyd's career is completely overrated because yes he beat guys who were ranked high BUT WHEN U LOOK AT IT AND ACTUALLY CRITICALLY THINK THEY WEREN'T GREAT WINS AT ALL!! seriously this is not hard to understand, but u keep looking at numbers and reading boxrec like a nerd.

step away from the numbers and boxrec and ACTUALLY USE UR BRAIN. just because someon is ranked #3 or is the lineal champ doesn't mean much unless u actually analyze it and use ur head.

The collective opinion of most boxing fans was that they were top 5 P4P fighters in the world when Mayweather fought them. Being past prime or not doesn't change their standing in the sport when Mayweather fought them, at that time they were the best.

[radioraheem]

Guerrero is a much smaller man than Mayweather.

So was JMM - Floyd couldn't even make the catch weight for Marquez.

Floyd waited until the smaller Pacquiao was shot to fight him.

Hatton had to move up a division to fight Floyd.

If Floyd wasn't a coward, he'd be fighting GGG at 154 for his WBC belt in that division, instead of facing a bum like Berto.

Guerrero was smaller you say?


According to the World Boxing Council, WBC welterweight champion Floyd Mayweather Jr. (43-0, 26KOs) weighed in at 148.2-pounds on April 4th, as part of the organization's 30-day weigh-in requirement.

Robert "The Ghost" Guerrero (31-1-1, 18KOs) weighed in at 159-pounds when the WBC conducted their 30-day weight check.

http://www.boxingscene.com/photo-floyd-mayweather-jr-already-close-147-limit--64301

[Robbie Barrett]

Guerrero is a much smaller man than Mayweather.

So was JMM - Floyd couldn't even make the catch weight for Marquez.

Floyd waited until the smaller Pacquiao was shot to fight him.

Hatton had to move up a division to fight Floyd.

If Floyd wasn't a coward, he'd be fighting GGG at 154 for his WBC belt in that division, instead of facing a bum like Berto.

Most of Klitschko's wins were against smaller men and i'm not talking about a few lbs, his best win is over a cruiserweight he outweighed by over 30lbs, bet you don't hold that against him do you?

[IronDanHamza]

Guerrero is a much smaller man than Mayweather.

So was JMM - Floyd couldn't even make the catch weight for Marquez.

Floyd waited until the smaller Pacquiao was shot to fight him.

Hatton had to move up a division to fight Floyd.

If Floyd wasn't a coward, he'd be fighting GGG at 154 for his WBC belt in that division, instead of facing a bum like Berto.

But when Guererro was a Welterweight you considered him to be one of the best 10 fighters in the world P4P.

[aldo5408]

Guerrero is a much smaller man than Mayweather.

So was JMM - Floyd couldn't even make the catch weight for Marquez.

Floyd waited until the smaller Pacquiao was shot to fight him.

Hatton had to move up a division to fight Floyd.

If Floyd wasn't a coward, he'd be fighting GGG at 154 for his WBC belt in that division, instead of facing a bum like Berto.

Why would he fight giggi at 154 when he weighs 150