Froch got used with a sold out Wembley Stadium. Nothing else would move him.
Comments Thread For: Hearn: I Spoke To Froch, He's Interested in Golovkin
Collapse
-
...So you don't pay for such a fight at the Wembley as venue? Why that?Comment
-
As of right now, I'd pick Froch because I think he'd stay on the outside. I also think his unorthodox style would confuse Golovkin a little bit. But if GGG knocks out Froch, he'd get full credit from me because we know, Froch has a granite chin, he's not afraid to exchange, and he has power. Interesting matchup.If Golovkin stopped Froch, I wonder if people would shit on it by saying Froch was done anyway? Some people would obviously, but what would the consensus be?
I think he'd get credit. Maybe not as much as he should, but taking out Carl Froch would be a serious statement, and put to bed any doubts about Golovkin's power at 168. For me at least.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Froch made $12.5mill for the Groves rematch, but that was because Groves refused the initial offer and it went to purse with Carl taking 85%. It was more less an anomaly that he made that much. In addition Groves was the marketing force behind that fight. That card overall generated $35mill, with a little more that $15.5mill going to the fighters.
If they fight on USppv, I'd imagine they'd be able to take in atleast 300k buys, giving the fighter's a total of about $7mill. Add in gate, MGM site fee, UKppv, and other foreign tv, there's no reason the fighter's total purse wouldn't reach atleast $10mill. Carve up a 60/40 split in Froch's favor and you can ask yourself would Froch take the fight for $6mill min? More than likely he'd make over $10mill depending how the UKppv would carry on a US fight time.
Comment
Comment