Tweet
why do you think i am trying to scare you with my question?
When you pose the question with "can you answer these questions then, Mr. Smart Guy?" it insinuates that you are assuming that you have stumped me.
A. Nobody can explain that without speculation and that is precisely my point.
Floyd fans where crying and whining that Floyd is not being given credit he was due but he is the one who is making all this speculations about him.
I didn't see anybody crying in this thread about Floyd not being given credit. The majority of responses in this thread are baseless PED accusations and people whining about Roach's claim that Pac has been tested 12 times (although there isn't any tangible proof to support this claim). They then say Mayweather is juicing because there is no proof that he is being tested. Is this not hypocrisy? What about in the case of Rios v Pac? There was video of Rios testing but no videos of Pac. Does that mean Pac was juicing by extension? Regardless of personal opinions there is no proof on either side. This is all just baseless hypocrisy.
B. Scenario A is random in a sense that they did came unannounced. but how are the USADA able to know when and where the subject of the random drug test will be if they will not call first to ask the subjects whereabouts?
All drug testing methods are fallible. Just as you have pointed out "random" blood testing isn't as random as you are led to believe because the agency must locate the fighters to administer tests thus giving them some form of notice. This is still not proof that Mayweather juiced. Just like Pac declining drug testing w/ no cutoff dates is not proof that Pac was juicing. It is all speculation and opinion.
it is not relevant to your post on this thread per se, but i remember you talking about legallity with slander and everything and there was a legal question in my post so most probably i thought you could provide an answer.
Fair enough. Sorry if my response seemed somewhat hostile. Respect.
When you pose the question with "can you answer these questions then, Mr. Smart Guy?" it insinuates that you are assuming that you have stumped me.
A. Nobody can explain that without speculation and that is precisely my point.
Floyd fans where crying and whining that Floyd is not being given credit he was due but he is the one who is making all this speculations about him.
I didn't see anybody crying in this thread about Floyd not being given credit. The majority of responses in this thread are baseless PED accusations and people whining about Roach's claim that Pac has been tested 12 times (although there isn't any tangible proof to support this claim). They then say Mayweather is juicing because there is no proof that he is being tested. Is this not hypocrisy? What about in the case of Rios v Pac? There was video of Rios testing but no videos of Pac. Does that mean Pac was juicing by extension? Regardless of personal opinions there is no proof on either side. This is all just baseless hypocrisy.
B. Scenario A is random in a sense that they did came unannounced. but how are the USADA able to know when and where the subject of the random drug test will be if they will not call first to ask the subjects whereabouts?
All drug testing methods are fallible. Just as you have pointed out "random" blood testing isn't as random as you are led to believe because the agency must locate the fighters to administer tests thus giving them some form of notice. This is still not proof that Mayweather juiced. Just like Pac declining drug testing w/ no cutoff dates is not proof that Pac was juicing. It is all speculation and opinion.
it is not relevant to your post on this thread per se, but i remember you talking about legallity with slander and everything and there was a legal question in my post so most probably i thought you could provide an answer.
Fair enough. Sorry if my response seemed somewhat hostile. Respect.
Responses above.
Comment