Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: I'm a Better Fighter Since Marquez Loss

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Big Dunn
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 70285
    • 9,940
    • 8,210
    • 287,568

    #111
    Originally posted by Strategic1
    Pac was a legit A-side at the time, while Floyd had his little retirement. Olympic testing was unheard of at this time. It was about egos more than anything else. As an A-Side, having another fighter dictate terms like this and at the same time make accusations,..was just BS.

    Eventually, PAC did agree to all these terms, ..and Floyd put a few other roadblocks up.

    Difference was,..there was nobody else doing testing 4-5 years ago. ...Now it's more accepted. And a bunch of cheats were found out in recent years.

    By the way,
    Body acne and joint pain/knee issues isn't paranoia. They are actual signs of steroid use.
    But like I said...If you can drink your own urine and think it has benefits, you are capable of anything.
    Dude, respectfully, you are doing it again. You looked at actions, I said OK here are Manny's actions, then you chalk that up to ego. Why can't you just look at his actions the same way you do with JMM? You only want to look at the actions of one side.

    This isn't about Floyd, it's about Manny's actions relative to the JMM 4 fight. You are right, more people got caught, all the more reason for testing.

    It's really simple dude-if you can use certain specific actions as "evidence" to suspect JMM, when Manny exhibits the same behavior/actions you should use it as "evidence" against him.

    If you don't, you just can't be seen as credible.

    Manny just lost because he made a mistake in the ring. Its sad that so many of his fans can not accept that.
    Last edited by The Big Dunn; 04-07-2015, 11:04 AM.

    Comment

    • Bolopunch68
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2014
      • 1191
      • 24
      • 0
      • 7,470

      #112
      Originally posted by 100percentTruth
      Mayweather fights undefeated fighters

      Corrales
      Canelo
      Hatton

      Pacquiao fights Oscar, Mosley, Hatton after Mayweather.

      Name an undefeated fighter Pacquiao has fought
      Bradley, Algiere, Don't come back here please....

      Comment

      • Bolopunch68
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2014
        • 1191
        • 24
        • 0
        • 7,470

        #113
        Originally posted by HanzGruber
        Consensus top 10 ww. And has a style that gives Floyd trouble. Rios top 10 punching bag algieri point blank wasn't ready. Point is claiming he improved just by beating up those guys is kinda dumb
        I see you intentionally didn't mention Bradley. Why? Is it because he was #3 P4P on the list when Manny beat him again?

        Comment

        • The Big Dunn
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2009
          • 70285
          • 9,940
          • 8,210
          • 287,568

          #114
          Originally posted by Bolopunch68
          I see you intentionally didn't mention Bradley. Why? Is it because he was #3 P4P on the list when Manny beat him again?
          were you one of the many pac fans that said his p4p ranking was bogus because he lost to pac and provo, only to change that position when the rematch was signed or did you tout tim as a legit #3 p4p boxer?

          Comment

          • Rustyjaguar
            Contender
            • May 2009
            • 241
            • 7
            • 0
            • 6,421

            #115
            Originally posted by Johnny_Roa
            Couldnt KO Brandon Rios (D- fighter) , couldnt finish off ALgieri (C- fighter), was ko'ed heavily by Marquez, but he's going to KO the current P4P king who's never even been knockdown'd.

            Sure.


            Here u go pac-tards
            you mayweather fans are unrealistic. He is no Monster.

            Comment

            • HanzGruber
              STRAPMEUP
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2011
              • 29824
              • 1,069
              • 238
              • 81,632

              #116
              Originally posted by Bolopunch68
              I see you intentionally didn't mention Bradley. Why? Is it because he was #3 P4P on the list when Manny beat him again?
              He beat him the first time. The second win doesn't mean much. And it was even after 6. Bradley just went full ******. Manny is hardly "better" since the ko

              Comment

              • Bolopunch68
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Dec 2014
                • 1191
                • 24
                • 0
                • 7,470

                #117
                Originally posted by Xi_
                I've said this to a lot of pacf@gs only to be ignored..... They have no answer. When Floyd beats the living crap out of pacquiao and May 2nd is over you'll see more excuses then ever......book it.
                Will you give Manny he's due after the fight when Michael announce he is the winner? Or are you going to disappear like 99% of Floyds nuts lickers?

                Comment

                • SkillspayBills
                  Garlic Butter Gang!
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 29181
                  • 2,155
                  • 3,739
                  • 61,188

                  #118
                  No version of Manny beats any version of Floyd. He's just too smart. Too good at neutralizing what you like to do and finding a way to counter your best attributes.

                  Comment

                  • Bolopunch68
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2014
                    • 1191
                    • 24
                    • 0
                    • 7,470

                    #119
                    Originally posted by HanzGruber
                    He beat him the first time. The second win doesn't mean much. And it was even after 6. Bradley just went full ******. Manny is hardly "better" since the ko
                    What do you mean the second win doesn't mean much? 1st loss is official regardless of what the majority of people said. 2nd time is official Manny wins it. You really didn't see some of changes from their 1st and 2nd encounter?

                    See, so many of you here said Manny doesnt adjust during the fight, he clearly adjusted. When Bradley couldn't hit him as often during the 1st 2 to 5 rounds, he decided to try to KO him w/c that's what they planned all along.

                    I know some of you Floyd fans are incapable of giving Manny some appreciation and admit that he have amazing skills. But it's ok, some of you said this fighter is this and that. But failed to realized Manny is prolly that good to make those fighters look average, like when Floyd make some of the fighters he fought look average.

                    Comment

                    • Bolopunch68
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Dec 2014
                      • 1191
                      • 24
                      • 0
                      • 7,470

                      #120
                      Originally posted by Doctor_Tenma
                      Pacquiao is more conservative where as before he didn't have to be because he would hardly ever tire. That doesn't make him better though, that makes him more susceptible to being read. People thought Hopkins became a better fighter because he became more conservative too, they were wrong as well and many are wrong now.
                      You can't seriously compare Hopkins and Manny in the same sentence. Different style, big difference. Your definition of Manny's conservative approach/style is way different from Hopkins conservative approach/style, think about it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP