yes, i was su****ous of manny, i never thought he was dirty though, but i was su****ous because of ariza and the things that was said about ariza from the floyd fans. which made me a little su****ous. now that ariza is with floyd, are u su****ous too? LOL!!! and u thought i would never say shiiet like this! LOL! like i said dunn, im not as attached to manny like u wish i was.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: I'm a Better Fighter Since Marquez Loss
Collapse
-
nothing you post will make what was said about Manny and PED's relative to the JMM fight. You made this up in your head like you do so much else of what you post. There is no rational response when you do this.LOL!!! so what was ariza doing to pac that pac hasnt been the same then? weird because ariza is only a s/c coach so how could manny not be the same since ariza left? was pac known to run out of gas late rounds?
i already have pac winning this fight from the beginning!! u really think i just decided pac is gonna win starting yesterday because of that interview with floyd and the comment i made about it? LOL!! that comment i made was to strike a nerve and not suprisely, it worked!
and there u go, bringing in manny's name. thats the only time u can say jmm is dirty. if u're not su****ious of jmm because he knocked manny out then what makes u think he is as dirty as manny? LOL
You tried the "strike a nerve" thing yesterday. It didn't work then its failed now. You made a ridiculous point as you did yesterday. Posters are responding to the ignorance of the post, not the substance of it.
They both passed the same tests so I think their "dirtiness" or "cleanliness" is equal.Comment
-
Floyd would need to do a little of both. With him coming in behind that high guard, he will be more susceptible to Manny's right hook which is his best punch imo. I think Floyd will invest in the body attack early and go from there. Manny makes most of his mistakes off of his over aggressiveness so Floyd would benefit from sitting back and picking his spots when Manny goes all kamikaze like he tends to do.I don't know if he is a better fighter, but he has adapted a more boxing first, war second tyoe attitude and seems to content to jump in and out, using hand speed and volume punching...
Weird to say but a boxing manny using angles and movements reminds me of JOE calzaghe but with better punching..
Manny seems much more content on boxing to a decision instead of going for the kill.. And this makes him very hard to beat because he has such fast footwork and high punch output..
That's why I think it's in Floyd's best interest to walk down manny behind the high guard and straight rights as opposed to sitting back like hopkins did vs calzaghe and taylor..Comment
-
No, I'm not because Floyd is taking tests. Manny was not taking tests back then.yes, i was su****ous of manny, i never thought he was dirty though, but i was su****ous because of ariza and the things that was said about ariza from the floyd fans. which made me a little su****ous. now that ariza is with floyd, are u su****ous too? LOL!!! and u thought i would never say shiiet like this! LOL! like i said dunn, im not as attached to manny like u wish i was.Comment
-
So would Roberto Duran and Mike Tyson and the list goes on. Interestingly, same as Pacquiao, they were 100% offensive as opposed to cowardly/super-defensive fighters, like the one Pacquiao will face on May 2nd.
Originally posted by Originally Posted by rambovNo Manny. Not true. But you also don't believe that...
Guys who got ktfo and came back????? 0000.0
Last edited by sterilizer; 04-07-2015, 02:01 PM.Comment
-
look at u avoiding the question. u said u're not su****ious of jmm being dirty because he knocked manny out. then u said jmm is as dirty as manny. so what do u mean by this?? jmm is only dirty if manny is dirty right? LOL!!! see what i mean.nothing you post will make what was said about Manny and PED's relative to the JMM fight. You made this up in your head like you do so much else of what you post. There is no rational response when you do this.
You tried the "strike a nerve" thing yesterday. It didn't work then its failed now. You made a ridiculous point as you did yesterday. Posters are responding to the ignorance of the post, not the substance of it.
They both passed the same tests so I think their "dirtiness" or "cleanliness" is equal.
why do u keep saying i was being serious about that comment i made yesterday? it seems like that comment pissed off a lot of the floyd fans because floyd was out of character and i happen to point that out. LOLComment
-
see this right here, dunn acting like a 10 year old. LOL.It means he hasn't been the same since he left. It doesn't mean anything else except in the warped mind of the obsessive compulsive pac fan.
You were. Then you pretended otherwise. You probably worded it wrong like you did earlier in this thread.
If you read the thread you will see it.
Of course I can. I'm not su****ious of JMM just because he knocked Manny out. I think JMM is a dirty as Manny. So if Manny is clean, so is JMM. If you tell me JMM is dirty, so is Manny.
Simple, easy to understand because both passed the same commission tests.
so if u're not su****ious of jmm being dirty because he knocked manny out then why would u say jmm is as dirty as manny?Comment
-
since they passed the same tests, they are either both clean or both dirty. take your pick.look at u avoiding the question. u said u're not su****ious of jmm being dirty because he knocked manny out. then u said jmm is as dirty as manny. so what do u mean by this?? jmm is only dirty if manny is dirty right? LOL!!! see what i mean.
why do u keep saying i was being serious about that comment i made yesterday? it seems like that comment pissed off a lot of the floyd fans because floyd was out of character and i happen to point that out. LOL
Again, pointing out the ******ity of a post does not mean the post pissed anyone off. The ******ity is what people are reacting to as the post has no substance.
Simple, easy to understand because both passed the same commission tests.Comment
Comment