Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Kell Brook Wants Juan Manuel Marquez at Bramall Lane

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Thurman - waste

    Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
    You can't get props by beating a 41 yr. old man, who lost to Bradley. But you can make A LOT of money! So if you want money, fight Marquez, if you want to be respected as an elite WW, fight Thurman. If Brook wants the winner of May vs. Pac, he needs to beat Thurman. Same can be said for Amir Khan, if he wants next, beat Thurman!
    Why should anyone beat Thurman? He is a no body. No fans asides a few forum dwellers. Thurman has one good win against a gallant but limited for in Ghost. Ghost had no motivation left and has been losing the plot for a while now. He also struggled against a EBU champion. Barely landed a power punch. Brook, who has done nothing asides from one win over hype job Porter would wreck Thurman. Neither deserves a big fight as neither have more than the one name on thief resume and zero risks!

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
      I understand Brook taking the bigger money fight since Khan will not fight. JMM did lose to Bradley so I don't see why Brook would fight the 4th best ww who IMO he is currently ahead of.

      Rather than JMM, I would love to see Thurman fight Brook as an "eliminator" to see who would be the #1 contender for the Floyd/Manny winner.
      Thurman is a no body. Beaten no one. Taken no hard fights. Both Brook and Keith need to get in with a Maidana or Bradley to get in the mix.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Box-Office View Post
        Name dropping Thurman, yet picking Marquez. This fight at this point is on par with Khan beating Barrera and that was a confidence builder.
        This is sig worthy.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
          I dont see JMM coming over

          JMM is a respectable name however, but a old old man, no way cud he beat someone fresh and young as Brook

          Its no different from Barrera vs Khan

          While even a old version of JMM is a step up from the likes of Rios, however it will not be a very competitive fight

          Brook by stoppage
          If they ever fight I will bet you that Brooks won't KO him

          Comment


          • #45
            Make it happen. Don't just talk. A Marquez fight is equally big. If the fight doesn't materialize, go for Thurman.
            Last edited by brettWall; 03-30-2015, 12:36 PM.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by uthmaann View Post
              Why should anyone beat Thurman? He is a no body. No fans asides a few forum dwellers. Thurman has one good win against a gallant but limited for in Ghost. Ghost had no motivation left and has been losing the plot for a while now. He also struggled against a EBU champion. Barely landed a power punch. Brook, who has done nothing asides from one win over hype job Porter would wreck Thurman. Neither deserves a big fight as neither have more than the one name on thief resume and zero risks!
              Thurman is a good fighter and his stock is growing but I laugh when people say that Khan or Brook "HAVE TO" beat Thurman to get to Mayweather

              Does Mayweather even know who Thurman is?

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by uthmaann View Post
                Thurman is a no body. Beaten no one. Taken no hard fights. Both Brook and Keith need to get in with a Maidana or Bradley to get in the mix.
                Thurman and Brook are the guys I see at #2 and #3 (along with Bradley) at ww. A fight between any of the group would be an "eliminator" of sorts.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                  Thurman and Brook are the guys I see at #2 and #3 (along with Bradley) at ww. A fight between any of the group would be an "eliminator" of sorts.
                  I rate Thurman, but how he can in the top 3 is beyond. me. Fought no one! Bradley beat JMM, is that how he got to 2. If so how can you Spag off Brook wanting to fight JMM.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by uthmaann View Post
                    I rate Thurman, but how he can in the top 3 is beyond. me. Fought no one! Bradley beat JMM, is that how he got to 2. If so how can you Spag off Brook wanting to fight JMM.
                    JMM isn't a factor in terms of WW anymore IMO because he said he will not fight Floyd or Manny again. Maybe he changes his mind. Until he does, I have him outside the Thurman, Brook and Bradley group.

                    I am not against it, I just prefer other fights to that one.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by LacedUp View Post


                      Idiotic comment.

                      Marquez is ranked higher than Brook. Barrera was shot to hell when Khan fought him.
                      Rankings r hogwash , everyone knows Marquez is pretty washed up now . Pleas don't predicate the validity of ur post on rankings ! Wasn't JoJo Dan ranked fairly high ?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP