Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What hurts a fighter's stock more a Loss or Ducking?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by SUBZER0ED View Post
    That's just it; in order to erase the shame of his duck(s), a fighter has to take on some notable opposition. Again, look at Stevenson. He's passed on some potentially great fights, and has instead fought lesser fights & even got dropped by Fonfarej. For him, the notable opposition he needs for redemption are the very guys he's ducked: Kovalev, Hopkins & Pascal.
    There are also instances where when a fighter loses in an all out war but goes out on his shield, it boosts his stock. Ward losing to Gatti and vice versa didn't lessen either fighters stock. Molina giving Lucas hell in an all out war didn't lessen his stock and is now facing broner. Canelo lost to Floyd and is still a high demand fighter. Pac got KTFO and is about to compete in the biggest boxing event of all time!

    On the contrary, had Floyd retired without facing Pac he would have forever been branded a ducker.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury View Post
      You should've added a 3rd and 4th option to your agenda trolling poll... The 3rd option would be ducking/declining/disregarding full random Olympic Style Drug Testing like Hopkins or Manny in 2009(you remember the real reason the Mayweather fight didn't happen in 2009). 4th option should be if a fighter admitted to taking PED's or failed a drug test for PED's.
      Wow the mind of a butthurt fan this has nothing to do with what you rambling on about you are being a defensive b*tch for no reason Making it sound like you're the one who thinks Floyd is a duck since I never did, you came to that conclusion all on your own.

      That being said the options are fine as I said UNDENIABLE ducks vs LOSS. Not maybe duck or hint of ducking i mean clear no two ways about it Aquacking Stevenson Quillin LSC type ducking.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
        There are also instances where when a fighter loses in an all out war but goes out on his shield, it boosts his stock. Ward losing to Gatti and vice versa didn't lessen either fighters stock. Molina giving Lucas hell in an all out war didn't lessen his stock and is now facing broner. Canelo lost to Floyd and is still a high demand fighter. Pac got KTFO and is about to compete in the biggest boxing event of all time!
        Canelo's stock did NOT go up after facing Floyd what... the... ****?

        Comment


        • #54
          Stevenson ducks Kovalev "Stevenson is a bum. He's ducking Kovalev"

          -But your still interested


          Stevenson gets KO'd by Kovalev "See I told you he was a bum. That's why he was ducking Kovalev."

          -Now your not interested


          Replace Stevenson and Kovalev with LSC/Rigo, GGG/Cotto or whoever.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
            Canelo's stock did NOT go up after facing Floyd what... the... ****?
            It didn't go up but it also didn't go down. Canelo had everything to gain and nothing to lose from that fight.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
              It didn't go up but it also didn't go down. Canelo had everything to gain and nothing to lose from that fight.
              His stock didn't go down... I don't know what Dunn was trying to say about Broner and Oscar, but everything else in that post was spot on. Canelo's stock didn't go down... you have to be trolling. I think he's crap and overratted and that was BEFORE he fought Floyd and I still thought he'd win 3 rounds. I thought he was **** before and his stock still went down with me with that farce of a performance. His buyrates dropped off by 2 million viewers... I don't know what to say other than you're ******. I mean that as respectfully as possible as well by the way but that's the only explanation for an idiotic comment like that.

              Comment


              • #57
                In the eyes of genuine fans, It's ducking. In this day and age however, Some People will interpret 'stock' and associate it with 'Dem Smart Bidnezz Skills!'

                As one Floyd fan said: "U Gotta Speculate to accumulate"

                Ducking may lead to Winnings!

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Beater_of_ass View Post
                  His stock didn't go down... I don't know what Dunn was trying to say about Broner and Oscar, but everything else in that post was spot on. Canelo's stock didn't go down... you have to be trolling. I think he's crap and overratted and that was BEFORE he fought Floyd and I still thought he'd win 3 rounds. I thought he was **** before and his stock still went down with me with that farce of a performance. His buyrates dropped off by 2 million viewers... I don't know what to say other than you're ******. I mean that as respectfully as possible as well by the way but that's the only explanation for an idiotic comment like that.
                  Stop being such a cotto cackboy and take the blinders off.

                  Buy rates dropped off by 2mil? So did Floyd's after Oscar! Does that mean Floyd's stock diminished due to his buyrates dropping off?

                  Canelo can fight any of the top guys in the division and still outsell Cotto vs the same guys. He's done it already!

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Mr 117-111 View Post
                    He still gets talked about and he's getting another title shot. I'm the biggest critic of Quillin on this site and agree that he should be fighting GGG yesterday.

                    But I'm not delusional. He's ducking because he can't win and will get good money and more title shots by avoiding him. If he gets KO'd he will struggle to get back to the position he is in right now.

                    What if Adrien Broner ducked Maidana and went back to lightweight? He would still have a trillion threads about him and people would still be calling him the next Floyd.
                    Quillen was yet unproven when he vacated. His actions have severely damaged his stock. His fighting for the title he just vacated, looks like some shady **** that he and Haymon are pulling.

                    If Broner had ducked Maidana, it would have been of little consequence because at the time, many believed Maidana was no match for him. If Broner had ducked Maidana after his two fights against Mayweather(and Broner was still undefeated), the impact would have been greater.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Deevel916 View Post
                      LOL. I was just about to ask the same thing!
                      Way to avoid.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP