I'm talking about a Leo Santa Cruz, or Quilling type of blatant undeniable no doubt b*tch ass duck vs taking 1 loss. In your mind which one makes the stock of a fighter drop the most?
What hurts a fighter's stock more a Loss or Ducking?
Collapse
-
What hurts a fighter's stock more a Loss or Ducking?
74I think Ducking lowers a fighters stock more78.38%58I think Loosing lowers a fighters stock more21.62%16The poll is expired.
Tags: None -
Comment
-
Comment
-
imagine theres a bully picking on you at school You can either fight him like a man or you can tell your mom to make you switch school
The answer is clearComment
-
That's my sentiment as well, stock gets h*t a lot harder when you vacate a belt to avoid a fighter.Like Quillin did for example he is a really good boxer but he wasn't worth a **** to the boxing community after he b*tched out like that to avoid korobov, and now everyone thinks, or at least hopes Lee will beat him.Comment
-
i would have to stomp out a ***** ya feel me? but at the same time if i can avoid the but whooping and still go on to make millions i'm set bruh.Comment
-
Depends on how we look at a 'duck'. Froch wanted to retire with chavez Jr in Vegas, vacated belt instead of fighting mand degale. Is it a duck? The bigger pay day may have been JCCJ, and he'd be having that fight if the injury hadn't happenedComment
Comment