Originally posted by jjsmyth87
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Bob Arum on Latest Pacquiao-Mayweather Rhetoric
Collapse
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostThey lost a lot of money with Mayweather? If they drop Mayweather/Haymon, they lose out on ALL Haymon fights. And suddenly those 700-900k viewers they've been getting, and 700-900k PPVs, turn to 400-500k viewers and 0 PPVs. HBO would take Mayweather/Haymon back just to **** on Showtime. Lol, let the Showtime boss try to boss around Haymon, let's see how that ends up for Showtime Boxing. They'll have to start from scratch.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rath View PostFloyd pays Al Haymon to shut the F up, sit, fetch, roll-over and play dead.
Floyd: Al I hired you to be my adviser and as an advisor, all you have to do is, fetch, sit, roll-over, and most important of all play dead. I am the boss Al, nobody talks no **** around here but me, I am paying you to zipped it, know your place Al.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weebler I View PostWhy does it have to be on May 2nd though?
When they were negotiating in late 2009, the fight was supposed to be in March 2010 so why the focus on May?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weebler I View PostWhy does it have to be on May 2nd though?
When they were negotiating in late 2009, the fight was supposed to be in March 2010 so why the focus on May?
I see what you're saying (the date shouldn't really matter) but look at what happened recently:
Canelo wants to take back Cinco de Mayo weekend for Mexicans so decides to fight on May 2.
Arum says, Canelo can have May 2 to fight Cotto since Canelo is Mexican and it is Cinco de Mayo weekend; Oscar agreed.
Floyd also demands to fight (vs Pac) on May 2.
Now, Oscar just recently said that should Pac-Floyd happen, Canelo will step aside and let them have the May 2 date.
So, basically, the ball is in Arum's court.
It's basically a back-and-forth thing between Arum and Floyd, as ridiculous as it is.Last edited by Ruthless One; 12-18-2014, 11:33 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jjsmyth87 View PostLMAO, Mayweather can claim he is his own boss all he wants, but at the end of the day he is signed to a biatch contract and is owned by Al Haymon just like Amir Khan, Danny Garcia, Lucas Mathysse, Marcos Maidana, and everyone else. He is as much of his own boss as Pacquiao is, and to top it off, every single one of his fights has been promoted by either golden boy or Top Rank. He has co-promoted a few of his matches but that's the same as Manny Pacquiao co promoting with his MP promotions, or Cotto co prooting with his Cotto Promotions and Khan promotions. So whats the real difference? Mayweather co promotes his fights with Golden Boy and gets paid by golden boy and pacquia does the same with top rank, but Pacquiao isn't signed to an advisor who controls everything and also isn't locked down to a network. I would say Manny has more control over his career than Floyd does up to this point. Now Floyd just got his promoters license for Mayweather promotions so he will probably be promoting his fights by himself, then ok yes THEN he will finally have more control over his career than Pacquiao does, wait a minute I lied, he is still an Al Haymon puppet at the end of the day lol he is such a clown its not even funny.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostWho is paying you to be brain dead moron , nobody you do it for free .
Nobody pays me you are right I do it for free.
While you are all over every thread with a minimum of 10 post each to reach your quota or else you are not getting any christmas bonus this month.
Your point is invalid until Haymon says otherwise and you show me the link where a decade is 11 years. you einstein descendant you"peeleft:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ruthless One View PostWell, right now, that's the date that Floyd and Arum are having an issue over.
I see what you're saying (the date shouldn't really matter) but look at what happened recently:
Canelo wants to take back Cinco de Mayo weekend for Mexicans so decides to fight on May 2.
Arum says, Canelo can have May 2 to fight Cotto since Canelo is Mexican and it is Cinco de Mayo weekend; Oscar agreed.
Floyd also demands to fight on May 2.
Now, Oscar just recently said that should Pac-Floyd happens, Canelo will step aside and let them have the May 2 date.
So, basically, the ball is in Arum's court.
It's basically a back-and-forth thing between Arum and Floyd.
The point of Floyd fighting on Mexican holidays is to help his PPV buys against guys like Guerrero, Ortiz and Maidana but a Pacquiao fight doesn't need a Mexican holiday, it sells big on any date.
If it's just an ego thing that he demanding that date then that's silly on his part, no need for it.
Canelo-Cotto actually does need that date because it will struggle to push 1m buys.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ruthless One View PostWell, right now, that's the date that Floyd and Arum are having an issue over.
I see what you're saying (the date shouldn't really matter) but look at what happened recently:
Canelo wants to take back Cinco de Mayo weekend for Mexicans so decides to fight on May 2.
Arum says, Canelo can have May 2 to fight Cotto since Canelo is Mexican and it is Cinco de Mayo weekend; Oscar agreed.
Floyd also demands to fight (vs Pac) on May 2.
Now, Oscar just recently said that should Pac-Floyd happen, Canelo will step aside and let them have the May 2 date.
So, basically, the ball is in Arum's court.
It's basically a back-and-forth thing between Arum and Floyd, as ridiculous as it is.
Comment
Comment