Originally posted by LacedUp
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wlad was never better
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by -Weltschmerz- View PostTo the contrary, he looked very light and mobile vs Pulev, was quick on his feet, threw a greater variety of punches. I don't know if you watched the fight, doesn't sound like it.
He wasn't anywhere near as quick on his feet or threw as many punches against Pulev as he did against Chagaev for instance or Peter. I'm not saying he looked bad the other night, in fact, other than the expected clinching, I thought he looked good.
Still doesn't change the fact that he looked more like his age vs Povetkin, his best recent opponent than at any other time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Weltschmerz- View PostTo the contrary, he looked very light and mobile vs Pulev, was quick on his feet, threw a greater variety of punches. I don't know if you watched the fight, doesn't sound like it.
It wouldn't matter if Wladimir outboxed a grizzly bear!
LacedUp and his "friends" will try and tell us that he looked like garbage doing it and the grizzly bear didn't have very good "footwork"
Comment
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostWell unlike some I don't judge a fighter on his capabilities against a skillless robot.
He wasn't anywhere near as quick on his feet or threw as many punches against Pulev as he did against Chagaev for instance or Peter. I'm not saying he looked bad the other night, in fact, other than the expected clinching, I thought he looked good.
Still doesn't change the fact that he looked more like his age vs Povetkin, his best recent opponent than at any other time.
I judged his performance against Kubrat Pulev, a 6'4" 240lb mountain of muscle with top level skills and a perfect record vs good opponents and who fought WK with intent. A hard punch and a strong chin.
A guy who would destroy any pre80's HW and atleast decision Foreman.
And he destroyed him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by beez721 View Postim curious. there has to be at least one posititve thing you can say about wlad as a boxer? for a guy who won a gold medal and is 63-3 as a pro he must have something going for him right? or are you just a hater
Comment
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostWell unlike some I don't judge a fighter on his capabilities against a skillless robot.
He wasn't anywhere near as quick on his feet or threw as many punches against Pulev as he did against Chagaev for instance or Peter. I'm not saying he looked bad the other night, in fact, other than the expected clinching, I thought he looked good.
Still doesn't change the fact that he looked more like his age vs Povetkin, his best recent opponent than at any other time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elroy1 View PostHe's just a ****ing hater.
It wouldn't matter if Wladimir outboxed a grizzly bear!
LacedUp and his "friends" will try and tell us that he looked like garbage doing it and the grizzly bear didn't have very good "footwork"
Comment
-
Originally posted by beez721 View Postim curious. there has to be at least one posititve thing you can say about wlad as a boxer? for a guy who won a gold medal and is 63-3 as a pro he must have something going for him right? or are you just a hater
You are pretty decent poster, don't sink to the level of Weltschmerz and co.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostWell unlike some I don't judge a fighter on his capabilities against a skillless robot.
He wasn't anywhere near as quick on his feet or threw as many punches against Pulev as he did against Chagaev for instance or Peter. I'm not saying he looked bad the other night, in fact, other than the expected clinching, I thought he looked good.
Still doesn't change the fact that he looked more like his age vs Povetkin, his best recent opponent than at any other time.
Comment
-
Comment