Ortiz did not beat the count
Collapse
-
-
that would make corruption a lot harder though. that's like saying lets keep track of all danny garcia's low blows. i mean can we even count that high?Comment
-
Nobody is including the 10, because he should never have said 10 since he was up by the time 10 should have come, the evidence being the fact that he's off the canvas when the 10 "diez" is began. Rewind any video .001 secs (at 9.999 second mark) back and what will you see?Last edited by Russian Crushin; 09-07-2014, 11:18 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
You thought it was 10 and then out. Now you're arguing over when the wave began and when he said 10. Half a second...loool you've made a right tit of yourselfThe beginning of the wave was half a second faster than his count. You said his count was consistent but the wave began before his count. How exactly is that splitting hairs? I know its hard getting pwn'd. Making up your own rules and then getting exposed on that as well is hard, i know
His count was consistent. The wave is 10. He wasn't on his feet. Fight over. Debate over.Comment
-
Comment
-
But what the referee is supposed to do if the count is beat is let the fighter continue and if he can't immediately step in and stop it. Personally I think Ortiz was not going to last at all but my screen shot shows he beat the count and what I just said is how it should have played out.
Comment
-
No its not 10 and out. If he says 10, the fight should be stopped. But he shouldnt have said 10 because he was up by the time 10 should have been said, and was also up when 10 was said.
The wave was began before the Diez. Im just asking you, if the wave did stop the fight, why did it start before the 10 count. The beginning of his wave was not consistent with his count at all, but his audible diez was. Half a second is a very big deal.
He was off the canvas by 10
Either way the wave and the diez both occurred when he was off the canvasComment
Comment