Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fury4daWIN
    takin' one for the team
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2015
    • 3110
    • 156
    • 318
    • 2,222

    #2681
    Originally posted by mlac
    your right, his resume is really good.
    Sigh. Just give it a rest.
    Last edited by Fury4daWIN; 10-15-2015, 02:56 PM.

    Comment

    • Jewish-Reptile
      COLD HEARTBREAKER
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 10708
      • 922
      • 1,095
      • 15,382

      #2682
      Originally posted by LacedUp
      Did he? Because I seem to remember Pulev feasting on bums and journeymen Chagaev style for his entire career leading up to Wlad.

      He certainly did not have a better resume than Povetkin by any stretch of the imagination.
      Dimitrenko and Ustinov had fought at and defeated the same level of opposition Chisora fought on how did you put it ? ' the best run of his career' ! they're both bums are they ? Where does that leave Chisora in your estimations ? And Pulev who ko'd both of those guys is a level below Chisora too right ?

      This is a fascinating insight into your logic, you must rate Fury and Haye the guys who defeated Chisora in the stratosphere right ?

      Comment

      • mlac
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2014
        • 20293
        • 1,620
        • 1,473
        • 210,093

        #2683
        Originally posted by Fury4daWIN
        Sigh. Just give it a rest.
        says the guy who is writing unread-ably long essay's on trying to convince us all fury is actually really good after all

        I only wanted to make a simple point that his resume is so poor that the jump up from c level class to a level class in klit is too big a gap to make, and all you fury fanboys started to lose their schit for 5 pages

        best of luck to him i say, i just hope he doesn't make a load of excuses about klit's style/whatever after he get's beaten next month.

        Comment

        • Fury4daWIN
          takin' one for the team
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • May 2015
          • 3110
          • 156
          • 318
          • 2,222

          #2684
          Originally posted by mlac
          I only wanted to make a simple point...
          Yes, we established that. It was a shit point, poorly made.

          Next.

          Comment

          • LoadedWraps
            Official NSB POTY 2016
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2010
            • 24197
            • 1,009
            • 1,464
            • 190,165

            #2685
            Originally posted by mlac
            says the guy who is writing unread-ably long essay's on trying to convince us all fury is actually really good after all

            I only wanted to make a simple point that his resume is so poor that the jump up from c level class to a level class in klit is too big a gap to make, and all you fury fanboys started to lose their schit for 5 pages

            best of luck to him i say, i just hope he doesn't make a load of excuses about klit's style/whatever after he get's beaten next month.
            You aren't being taken seriously when you make statements like that. It has nothing to do with whom you are a fan of, saying he has only beaten bums is foolish and ignorant. That goes for Fury, Pulev, and Povetkin.

            The only top HW you can make an argument lile that for is Wilder, and I still wouldn't bash him for it because he hasn't had chances otherwise, and he eventually will.

            You seem so excited that you think you are getting under us Fury fans skin but none of your criticisms are true, so your agenda falls incredibly short, and every retort we throw back at you decimates your comments. By all means keep trying though.

            Comment

            • SlySlickSmooth
              SWIFT
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jun 2012
              • 12735
              • 421
              • 291
              • 26,153

              #2686
              Fuck Wladimir and the clique he claim.

              Gypsy side when we ride come equipped with game.

              Comment

              • Burt Saxby
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • May 2013
                • 170
                • 22
                • 2
                • 6,486

                #2687
                Originally posted by Elroy1
                Imo Carlos Takam would leave Fury a tangled spider unconscious in a pool of blood. He would not even be able to remember his name!

                I like Tyson Fury but he can't be considered the 2nd best HW yet.

                Perhaps as high as 5th or 6th maybe.

                All we can say with certainty is that he is much better than Wilder who despite being champ, is questionable whether he could really be in the top 10 considering his only 2 top victories (Scott and Stiverne) were both devalued or flat out shonky respetively.

                Putting on a class act vs Chisora and grinding out Cunningham don't exactly qualify for the upper eschelons of excellence.
                Tyson sparred with Tackam and Tackam withdrew after 4 rounds.

                Malik Scott got badly busted up and sent to the hospital after only 4 rounds as well.

                Current WBC Champion couldn't beat Scott without a fix. Scott would easily beat both Vitali and Wladimir.

                Comment

                • mlac
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2014
                  • 20293
                  • 1,620
                  • 1,473
                  • 210,093

                  #2688
                  Originally posted by LoadedWraps
                  You aren't being taken seriously when you make statements like that. It has nothing to do with whom you are a fan of, saying he has only beaten bums is foolish and ignorant. That goes for Fury, Pulev, and Povetkin.

                  The only top HW you can make an argument lile that for is Wilder, and I still wouldn't bash him for it because he hasn't had chances otherwise, and he eventually will.

                  You seem so excited that you think you are getting under us Fury fans skin but none of your criticisms are true, so your agenda falls incredibly short, and every retort we throw back at you decimates your comments. By all means keep trying though.
                  Beg my pard', would it make you feel better if i said 'fury has fought only fought short bum's and blown up cruiser's + Derick Chisora'?

                  Please stop comparing fury with a proven legit heavyweight in sasha, it's blasphemous to compare povetkin with such an oaf.
                  Im lovin' these levels of delusion tho, keep it up, i love how pointing out the obvious makes me have an agenda

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #2689
                    Originally posted by Scott-Weiland
                    Dimitrenko and Ustinov had fought at and defeated the same level of opposition Chisora fought on how did you put it ? ' the best run of his career' ! they're both bums are they ? Where does that leave Chisora in your estimations ? And Pulev who ko'd both of those guys is a level below Chisora too right ?

                    This is a fascinating insight into your logic, you must rate Fury and Haye the guys who defeated Chisora in the stratosphere right ?
                    Ustinov and Dimitrenko? What is their best combined win? Michael Sprott probably. Absolutely laughable. Chisora has beaten Helenius, Scott, Johnson - even Pulev gave up the EBU belt to avoid Chisora. Also, add to that Chisora had been competitive with Klitschko & Haye and fought Fury twice. Proven on another level to Pulev.

                    Steve Cunningham is a 2 time world champion who should have had a W over Adamek when he was ranked in the top 10. Has since gone on a decent run at heavy with wins over Mansour and a debatable loss to Glazkov and draw to Tarver. Beat Marco Huck in the past too who arguably beat Povetkin.

                    It's very simple to understand for a person who knows boxing. Which you obviously don't you're just keen to build up Klitschko.

                    What is Wach's best win? Kevin McBride? Perez' is Mago. Neither of which can even remotely compare to a Helenius or Scott.
                    Last edited by LacedUp; 10-15-2015, 08:24 PM.

                    Comment

                    • LacedUp
                      Still Smokin'
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 29171
                      • 781
                      • 381
                      • 132,163

                      #2690
                      Originally posted by Szef
                      Cunningham has a good resume at CW. At HW: Adamek (he won that fight), Mansour, a draw with Tarver. Two of them were past prime has beens (Adamek, Tarver) and one never was (Mansour.) And oh, all of them were 35+ when he fought them.

                      This is the resume of the guy who's widely considered as the best name on Fury's resume.
                      And? Where did I say it was impressive?

                      It's still undoubtedly better than Perez and Wach who have a combined 1 solid win on their resume.

                      Add Chisora's resume and it's not even close.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP