Originally posted by mlac
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostDid he? Because I seem to remember Pulev feasting on bums and journeymen Chagaev style for his entire career leading up to Wlad.
He certainly did not have a better resume than Povetkin by any stretch of the imagination.
This is a fascinating insight into your logic, you must rate Fury and Haye the guys who defeated Chisora in the stratosphere right ?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fury4daWIN View PostSigh. Just give it a rest.
I only wanted to make a simple point that his resume is so poor that the jump up from c level class to a level class in klit is too big a gap to make, and all you fury fanboys started to lose their schit for 5 pages
best of luck to him i say, i just hope he doesn't make a load of excuses about klit's style/whatever after he get's beaten next month.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mlac View Postsays the guy who is writing unread-ably long essay's on trying to convince us all fury is actually really good after all
I only wanted to make a simple point that his resume is so poor that the jump up from c level class to a level class in klit is too big a gap to make, and all you fury fanboys started to lose their schit for 5 pages
best of luck to him i say, i just hope he doesn't make a load of excuses about klit's style/whatever after he get's beaten next month.
The only top HW you can make an argument lile that for is Wilder, and I still wouldn't bash him for it because he hasn't had chances otherwise, and he eventually will.
You seem so excited that you think you are getting under us Fury fans skin but none of your criticisms are true, so your agenda falls incredibly short, and every retort we throw back at you decimates your comments. By all means keep trying though.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elroy1 View PostImo Carlos Takam would leave Fury a tangled spider unconscious in a pool of blood. He would not even be able to remember his name!
I like Tyson Fury but he can't be considered the 2nd best HW yet.
Perhaps as high as 5th or 6th maybe.
All we can say with certainty is that he is much better than Wilder who despite being champ, is questionable whether he could really be in the top 10 considering his only 2 top victories (Scott and Stiverne) were both devalued or flat out shonky respetively.
Putting on a class act vs Chisora and grinding out Cunningham don't exactly qualify for the upper eschelons of excellence.
Malik Scott got badly busted up and sent to the hospital after only 4 rounds as well.
Current WBC Champion couldn't beat Scott without a fix. Scott would easily beat both Vitali and Wladimir.
Comment
-
Originally posted by LoadedWraps View PostYou aren't being taken seriously when you make statements like that. It has nothing to do with whom you are a fan of, saying he has only beaten bums is foolish and ignorant. That goes for Fury, Pulev, and Povetkin.
The only top HW you can make an argument lile that for is Wilder, and I still wouldn't bash him for it because he hasn't had chances otherwise, and he eventually will.
You seem so excited that you think you are getting under us Fury fans skin but none of your criticisms are true, so your agenda falls incredibly short, and every retort we throw back at you decimates your comments. By all means keep trying though.
Please stop comparing fury with a proven legit heavyweight in sasha, it's blasphemous to compare povetkin with such an oaf.
Im lovin' these levels of delusion tho, keep it up, i love how pointing out the obvious makes me have an agenda
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View PostDimitrenko and Ustinov had fought at and defeated the same level of opposition Chisora fought on how did you put it ? ' the best run of his career' ! they're both bums are they ? Where does that leave Chisora in your estimations ? And Pulev who ko'd both of those guys is a level below Chisora too right ?
This is a fascinating insight into your logic, you must rate Fury and Haye the guys who defeated Chisora in the stratosphere right ?
Steve Cunningham is a 2 time world champion who should have had a W over Adamek when he was ranked in the top 10. Has since gone on a decent run at heavy with wins over Mansour and a debatable loss to Glazkov and draw to Tarver. Beat Marco Huck in the past too who arguably beat Povetkin.
It's very simple to understand for a person who knows boxing. Which you obviously don't you're just keen to build up Klitschko.
What is Wach's best win? Kevin McBride?Perez' is Mago. Neither of which can even remotely compare to a Helenius or Scott.
Last edited by LacedUp; 10-15-2015, 08:24 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Szef View PostCunningham has a good resume at CW. At HW: Adamek (he won that fight), Mansour, a draw with Tarver. Two of them were past prime has beens (Adamek, Tarver) and one never was (Mansour.) And oh, all of them were 35+ when he fought them.
This is the resume of the guy who's widely considered as the best name on Fury's resume.
It's still undoubtedly better than Perez and Wach who have a combined 1 solid win on their resume.
Add Chisora's resume and it's not even close.
Comment
Comment