Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
    Who has Chisora soundly beaten ? Wach's ko of Hammer is more impressive than anything he has ever done, Perez would school the other three, Cunningham and his resume, lmao, you're funny.
    Remember he's the ****** of the year

    To the Fury fans: I don't see a HOF in Fury, or someone that'll last long against even Old Wlad. Wlad hits like a truck, Cunningham is quite feather fisted in this division and he was able to put him down.

    I don't like Wladimir at all, he's a ****ing a cheat and utterly boring. But that doesn't make me biased as hell. I know what he is also capable of, I definitely want Fury to win. He will brighten the division, but I just don't think he'll be the one.

    WAR FURY! Nonetheless, put the old man in retirement already

    Comment


    • Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
      Cunningham and Chisora have much better resumes than Wach and Perez.

      Undoubtedly.
      Cunningham has a good resume at CW. At HW: Adamek (he won that fight), Mansour, a draw with Tarver. Two of them were past prime has beens (Adamek, Tarver) and one never was (Mansour.) And oh, all of them were 35+ when he fought them.

      This is the resume of the guy who's widely considered as the best name on Fury's resume.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
        Bold statement coming from yourself.

        I would love to see your heavyweight top ten, I guess it reads something like

        1.Fury
        2.Hammer
        3.Chisora
        4.Cunningham
        5.Joshua
        6.Johnson
        7.Hughie
        8.Teper
        9.Price
        10.Sprott



        you shouldn't mock, if you read about the detail's and analysis (you are posting none) of fury you wouldn't be acting like that
        http://www.badlefthook.com/2015/3/4/...eight-analysis

        just look at that gif and try not to be amazed i dare you, it's simply outstanding movement, the fluidity and subtlety on his feet for such a large man is ali'esque.
        povetkin and klitchschko may as well just retire now.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by mlac View Post


          you shouldn't mock, if you read about the detail's and analysis (you are posting none) of fury you wouldn't be acting like that
          http://www.badlefthook.com/2015/3/4/...eight-analysis

          just look at that gif and try not to be amazed i dare you, it's simply outstanding movement, the fluidity and subtlety on his feet for such a large man is ali'esque.
          povetkin and klitchschko may as well just retire now.
          Wach needed no fluidity and subtle deft pitty patting, he just needed powerful combination punches to score a more impressive victory than Fury has ever achieved in his career. Wach may be a lead footed, but he has attributes Fury does not, likelihood is he'd stop Fury if he caught him once.

          I'm not mocking I'm objectively looking at Fury's resume, which lets be fair is pretty poor, when you compare Wach's best win to Fury's best win Wach has a superior win, a more crowning definitive victory. I look at Wach and see he hasn't the varied skill set Fury has but he has crude raw power, that power wasn't enough to stop Wlad, Fury's power in contrast to Wach's is nothing like as showcased in their resumes. Yet you're gonna tell me Fury has the ability to stop Wlad ?

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Calculating... View Post
            Remember he's the ****** of the year

            To the Fury fans: I don't see a HOF in Fury, or someone that'll last long against even Old Wlad. Wlad hits like a truck, Cunningham is quite feather fisted in this division and he was able to put him down.

            I don't like Wladimir at all, he's a ****ing a cheat and utterly boring. But that doesn't make me biased as hell. I know what he is also capable of, I definitely want Fury to win. He will brighten the division, but I just don't think he'll be the one.

            WAR FURY! Nonetheless, put the old man in retirement already
            I would have like to added undisputed to that title for him, never mind always next year.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
              Wach needed no fluidity and subtle deft pitty patting, he just needed powerful combination punches to score a more impressive victory than Fury has ever achieved in his career. Wach may be a lead footed, but he has attributes Fury does not, likelihood is he'd stop Fury if he caught him once.

              I'm not mocking I'm objectively looking at Fury's resume, which lets be fair is pretty poor, when you compare Wach's best win to Fury's best win Wach has a superior win, a more crowning definitive victory. I look at Wach and see he hasn't the varied skill set Fury has but he has crude raw power, that power wasn't enough to stop Wlad, Fury's power in contrast to Wach's is nothing like as showcased in their resumes. Yet you're gonna tell me Fury has the ability to stop Wlad ?
              fury has already stopped wlad.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                Did he? Because I seem to remember Pulev feasting on bums and journeymen Chagaev style for his entire career leading up to Wlad.

                He certainly did not have a better resume than Povetkin by any stretch of the imagination.
                Maybe not, but considering their relative time in the sport, Povetkin's wins were hardly anything to shout about. In fact of his last dozen fights leading up to the Wlad fight his only noteworthy scalps were an extremely close and somewhat disputed decision over Huck and a less-than-impressive showing against a fat and past prime Chagaev. Other than that his resume was littered with no names like Teke Oruh and Taurus Sykes, plus a completely meaningless win over a shot to shit Hasim Rahman. You have to go back to 2008 before you find another relevant name on his resume in Chambers, once again a fighter he struggled with, though both were fairly green at the time.

                Pulev had his fair share of padding as well, but he also had back to back wins over Dimitrenko, Ustinov and Thompson, dominating two and clearly beating the other. He was far more prepared heading into the Wlad fight than Povetkin, regardless of how both fights panned out. If he was feasting on bums then he wasn't the only one at the table.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by mlac View Post
                  You're just getting emotional now, i never said fury was a bum, i said fury has only fought bum's therefore is not proven, and to say he beats a proven heavyweight such as povetkin is simply ridiculous.
                  are you able to grasp this m8?
                  Except he hasn't, as numerous people have pointed out in this thread.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Fury4daWIN View Post
                    Except he hasn't, as numerous people have pointed out in this thread.
                    your right, his resume is really good.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Scott-Weiland View Post
                      USS and Chisora are not bums but Wach and Perez are, only in Fury fan world !
                      None of those fighters are bums. Why do people throw this word around like it's going out of fashion?

                      Good grief.
                      Last edited by Fury4daWIN; 10-15-2015, 02:47 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP