Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread
Collapse
-
Comment
-
I watched Pulev-Wlad again this weekend, and anyone who claims that he's a superior boxer to Fury needs their head looking at. No foot movement, no head movement, absolute bum. Fury wouldn't lose a round against him.Comment
-
Pulev absolutely sucks, no argument there. That doesn't make fury any better. The division is **** but fury hasn't even beaten top names in that **** division. I don't see how he doesn't get blown away. He's out of his league.Comment
-
stiverne was not even there when he fought wilder and wilder couldnt knock himout, i think a rematch would be alot closer, not saying he would 100% win but he would do a way better count for himself in a rematch.Comment
-
It doesn't matter against Wlad though - He might not last 5 rounds, he might get KTFO.
He would still beat Pulev every day of the week.Comment
-
I know right!!
Like the only reason he wouldn't have fought a top tenner was because they ll ducked him at the time.
Then there's that whopper of Neds where he claims he only took on the fighters that he knew he could beat, when in reality, he fought all of his MANDATORY opponents who wouldn't be there had they not achieved it.
Ducking Sanders was previously debunked, ducking Lewis is ridiculous since it was Wladimir's singular goal for a time, and ducking Williamson rematch, pffft, PLEASE! LOL
And then we have the woeful era argument. Take a look at past eras, small, weak, can barely even box, punchbaggery, dudes off the street, then look at todays era, strong, powerful, sharp, elite athletes- not very convincing!
The devil is in the details junior.Comment
-
Are you still wowwing them at the gym junior? showing them how you can puch as hard as George Foreman when someone holds the bag for you, and that any pub brawler would walk through the division?Comment
Comment