Originally posted by madfrank
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Official Tyson Fury vs Wladimir Klitschko Post Fight Discussion Thread
Collapse
-
Originally posted by madfrank View PostThis is Tyson Furys biggest test to date and I think he will get found out for what he is. Klitschko is too clever for him and wont be drawn into a full on fight. He will let Fury tire himself out and either finish him in the 8th or win on points. There will a lot of clinches in this one.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KnockoutNed View PostWlad's stoppage rate in his last 4 fights is 50%.
Fury's is 100%
RRRRREALLLLLYYYY Ned? Is the the BEST your feeble little nut head can come up with here? Is that really how rotten the cherry's are left on the statistical tree now days??
Look at the level of bloody opposition!! LOL
If Wlad was ALLOWED to line up a list of opponents as easy as Fury's he would have knocked nearly every single one of them out.
And there have been some more whoppers going around here also.
Pulev- You can only make a proper appreciation of him, and ANY other Wladimir opponent by EXCLuding their fights with Wlad and focussing only on other opponnents, where we see how good they really are. Obviously nobody can look good vs Wlad because it his style to breakdown all other styles.
Same with Jennings, you cannot compare the level of opposition of guys like Jennings and Pulev to that of Fury because Thompson, Perez etc are better than Fury themselves most likely!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Elroy1 View Post
RRRRREALLLLLYYYY Ned? Is the the BEST your feeble little nut head can come up with here? Is that really how rotten the cherry's are left on the statistical tree now days??
Look at the level of bloody opposition!! LOL
If Wlad was ALLOWED to line up a list of opponents as easy as Fury's he would have knocked nearly every single one of them out.
And there have been some more whoppers going around here also.
Pulev- You can only make a proper appreciation of him, and ANY other Wladimir opponent by EXCLuding their fights with Wlad and focussing only on other opponnents, where we see how good they really are. Obviously nobody can look good vs Wlad because it his style to breakdown all other styles.
Same with Jennings, you cannot compare the level of opposition of guys like Jennings and Pulev to that of Fury because Thompson, Perez etc are better than Fury themselves most likely!Originally posted by KnockoutNed View PostChisora is better than Jennings. Hammer is better than Leapie. Cunningham is better than Pulev.
The doors over there
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. We are about to find out if Fury is a worthy opponent for Wlad by watching them fight.
No need to argue any more about whether Perez is better than Fury, or Jennings is better than Hammer and Cunningham, Chisora is better than Pulev ... blah blah,
Relax, wait, and see what happens on Oct 24th. All that other stuff is irrelevant now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elroy1 View PostPulev- You can only make a proper appreciation of him, and ANY other Wladimir opponent by EXCLuding their fights with Wlad and focussing only on other opponnents, where we see how good they really are.
And they have proved they weren't that good.
None of them have beaten a Dereck Chisora level opponent as easy or impressively as Fury did.Last edited by LacedUp; 09-17-2015, 11:28 PM.
Comment
-
What makes a part time nobody like Jennings better than Chisora? What form has he ever shown, who has he ever beaten? Jennings has no visible boxing skill whatsoever. He knew he wasn't good enough to step in the ring with 40 year old Ortiz.
His best win is a football hooligan who was sent back and forth from Poland TWICE on fight week. He came to the ring suffering chronic jet lag and Jennings still struggled.
Comment
Comment