Originally posted by SlySlickSmooth
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather: "The rematch referee is going to be totally strict"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Postso the crux of this thread is:
if the ref allows both fighters to get away with fouling that's fine because it gives Maidana a better chance to win. But if he calls it as he is supposed to and uses warnings and point deductions to eliminate it (as the rules suggest) then its bad because Maidana wont have as much of a chance to win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MindBat View PostHe's been doing for years and would've been disqualified for it many moons ago. He has been warned about pushing off with it at times by refs.
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bigg Rigg View PostJust because he's been doing it for yrs just means he's been getting away with it for yrs. not that it's ok cuz he's been doing it for so long. He's dirty himself and crys like a lil baby when he gets roughed up. **** him, I hope Chino murks that p*ssy!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by DempseyRollin View PostHes gotten in trouble for it on numerous occasions. With that said, his elbows aren't the kind of blatant fouls that a rabbit punch or a low blow is. He uses his elbow to push off, he doesn't use it as a weapon. There is a good deal of difference. Both dirty but both aren't blatant.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weebler I View PostNo the crux of the thread is that Floyd appears to believe he has control over the referee before the fight even starts.
You are taking gamesmanship way to seriously, especially given the first fight where both guys, but especially Maidana, were not admonished.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Bigg Rigg View PostJust because he's been doing it for yrs just means he's been getting away with it for yrs. not that it's ok cuz he's been doing it for so long. He's dirty himself and crys like a lil baby when he gets roughed up. **** him, I hope Chino murks that p*ssy!!!
At least he's giving Maidana another go at "murking" him.
.
Comment
Comment