Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should Froch be no. 1 if he beats Groves?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
    Oh wait, I got confused. I remember just how Ric Flair used to say it now...

    "To be the man....wooooo.....you've gotta lose comprehensively to the man.....wooo......then you've gotta hope the man has legal issues with his promoter and becomes inactive.....wooo.....then you beat a couple of fringe contenders....woooo....and then you're the man....WOOO!"
    Dirk going in hard on you clowns this morning haha

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by SnakeVen0m View Post
      Dirk going in hard on you clowns this morning haha
      It's actually embarrassing as a Carl Froch fan to hear people say this.

      Cringe.

      Comment


      • #23
        He will be #1......BUT WARD IS THE CHAMPION.....So yea Froch will be the #1 contender

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
          It's actually embarrassing as a Carl Froch fan to hear people say this.

          Cringe.
          I don't know what's more embarrassing...

          The way you act or you calling Bute and Kessler fringe contenders.

          Comment


          • #25
            what if ward fought a bum like baldomir and lost? would ward still be above froch since he beat froch which means we can never have froch above ward ever again right?

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
              I don't know what's more embarrassing...

              The way you act or you calling Bute and Kessler fringe contenders.
              You don't become the number 1 in a division by beating the number 3 (Bute) or the number 4/5 (Kessler).

              Funnily enough, you become the number 1 guy by beating the number 1 guy.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by daggum View Post
                what if ward fought a bum like baldomir and lost? would ward still be above froch since he beat froch which means we can never have froch above ward ever again right?
                Ward can do whatever the *** he likes from now on, he'll always be #1 because he beat Froch 3 years ago.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                  You don't become the number 1 in a division by beating the number 3 (Bute) or the number 4/5 (Kessler).

                  Funnily enough, you become the number 1 guy by beating the number 1 guy.
                  Right,

                  But Bute was #1 and Kessler was #2.

                  Nevertheless, so you agree that Ward could fight say, Travoris Cloud at smw and then beat J'leon love over the next 3 years and then still be regarded top dog?

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                    Ward can do whatever the *** he likes from now on, he'll always be #1 because he beat Froch 3 years ago.
                    Where you one of the people who was campaigning for Khan to land a shot against Floyd because he beat Maidana 4 years ago?

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
                      Right,

                      But Bute was #1 and Kessler was #2.

                      Nevertheless, so you agree that Ward could fight say, Travoris Cloud at smw and then beat J'leon love over the next 3 years and then still be regarded top dog?
                      What the hell are you talking about? How were Bute and Kessler the 1 and 2 in the division?

                      So what is Ward now? 4? 5?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP