Which group is more pathetic and ridiculous within boxing fans?
Collapse
-
-
-
I will give you an example (which is the easiest example to use). You will see the haters/fanboys start 10 negative threads about Floyd, then those same posters will post 10 positive threads about Manny. Once a Floyd fan post one positive thread about Floyd, they are the first ones in it stating how its a circle jerk. So its ok for them to praise their fighter, but no one else can praise a fighter they like.Comment
-
Comment
-
Pretty much the same i would say but the worst ones are those who keeps hypothetically talking about one fighter can't win or will never win and then justify the ducking of their favorite boxer because they already analysed the other fighter will never win anyway...on paper or fantasy fight.I would say overall the haters are worse depending on why they hate the fighter. I don't like some fighters like Broner because of they way they conduct themselves. Some guys hate a fighter just because other fans think that fighter is better than their favorite fighter and I think that's a poor reason to hate a fighter. When any fighter is talked about as a guy that could beat Mayweather he is going to be hated by some of the Mayweather fans. Some boxers just beg to be hated and I see nothing wrong with hating them. Other fighters like GGG and Pacquiao are kind and friendly to everyone but they get their share of hate because they are so good and a threat to other fan's favorite fighters.Comment
-
I don't see anything wrong with sticking up for your favorite fighter if you believe he is better than others are saying as long as you don't go overboard trashing his rivals. When people say Canelo is an overrated hypejob who won't fight the better fighters I'll be there to defend him. When people say Pacquiao is all through as a good fighter or never was good at all I'll be there to defend him. When the Khan fans get angry because Mayweather fights Maidana instead of Khan I'll be there to argue that Maidana earned a shot at Mayhweather and Khan didn't.Comment
-
You're embarrassing yourself.Hahahaha, I forgot to list you as an example in my first post.
CRold is a joke and should not be considered anything legitimate.
Just because he's a writer doesn't mean he doesn't have a misguided opinion.
He's one of the biggest haters on here, he just goes about it a different way.
The guy is a bias idiot who really doesn't have the mental faculties to know it. He has really convinced himself that he's not biased. It shows how out of touch with reality he is.
And if you want to know how much he actually knows about boxing, look no further than his prediction record.Comment
-
I do, it makes you a puto maricon and probably a vegan as well.I don't see anything wrong with sticking up for your favorite fighter if you believe he is better than others are saying as long as you don't go overboard trashing his rivals. When people say Canelo is an overrated hypejob who won't fight the better fighters I'll be there to defend him. When people say Pacquiao is all through as a good fighter or never was good at all I'll be there to defend him. When the Khan fans get angry because Mayweather fights Maidana instead of Khan I'll be there to argue that Maidana earned a shot at Mayhweather and Khan didn't.Comment
-
You know, thinking about it now...the difference in haters is actually very marked. As well as the fanboys. I mean, let's say as an example of a Floyd fan and Manny hater. That could just be some teenager from the hood that idolises Floyd and just 'proves loyalty' by going against his biggest rival. But there are those out there that are mature (should be) grown men, who spend their days on this forum SIMPLY to hate or **** on fighters. That is pretty sad to be honest. It may be naivety of certain individuals to idolize fighters...but it takes a really angry person to devote a certain hate for a fighter. Simply disliking isn't what we are talking about here - it's specifically blind, unconditional and constant hate.Comment
-
Jab and Dirk take part in multiple discussions across the board on this site, and add a lot of insight to debates. I've seen them both criticize and praise the same fighter for different reasons - the way it should be.
The same can clearly not be said for you. You only partake in discussions about a very limited number of fighters and crawl into your shell of hate and despise when someone disagrees with you.
I clearly remember the debates with Jab where you fail to provide him with any reasonable answers for his questions, instead just resorting to call him a hater because he points out flaws in your argument.Comment
Comment