Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Boxing goat has wlad the better p4p fighter than rigo. Do u agree?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by pigsfly View Post
    to be honest......p4p rigo is far better then wlad could ever dream of.

    it's like shrinking wlad into a mini version of himself (same height same weight as rigo) and matching them together. do you really think wlad would win? no...........he'd get out witted, picked apart, & demolished.


    wtf..............
    ^^^^^^^^^^

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
      You have to imagine skillsets,,, wlad at heavy is a big tall jabber with big power, in a h2h with rigo at the lower weights, he would still be a big tall jabber with big power, just like a Kelly pavlik type fighter... And guys like serg, rigo, Floyd, Hopkins, ward would carve him up..
      So you are basically comparing a limited guy with average skills to the Olympic gold medalist who now dominates the sport for a decade?

      Comment


      • #43
        Boxing goat? Did Ali say this?

        On a serious note, I'd rank Wlad higher but wouldn't mind if someone had Rigo higher.

        Here's why:

        Wlad has dominated as THE heavyweight champion for almost a decade.

        Wlad is the most complete fighter in his division and head and shoulders above everyone else (same can probably be said for Rigo but his only real challenge has been Nonito)

        His jab is one of the best in the game and overall skill package is comparable to almost anyone in the sport, yes he lacks a good inside game but he makes up for it with terrific movement for a heavyweight, fast hands and immense power.

        Rigo has Wlad beat on all round skill by a hairs breadth, but Wlad has superior power and superior achievement. So Id rank Wlad higher.

        Comment


        • #44
          If the question is

          "If you used a shrink ray on Wlad and didn't allow him to make any stylistic changes despite losing 50-60% of his body weight who would win?"

          The obvious answer to that ridiculous rigged question is Rigo. He would beat any heavyweight in history under those circumstances. Hell so would Donaire, Darchinyan, etc.

          If the question is

          "If you made both fighters into middleweights and allowed them to adapt their styles to that weight, based on the P4P track record of each fighter, who do you think would win?

          In that case I would say Wlad

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Stallion_ View Post
            So you are basically comparing a limited guy with average skills to the Olympic gold medalist who now dominates the sport for a decade?
            Pavlik was a undefeated lineal champ with only defeats to Hopkins and serg..

            Remind me again who is as good as Hopkins and serg that wlad fought...

            Comment


            • #46
              Resume and ability are two different things

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Lebanon View Post
                If the question is

                "If you used a shrink ray on Wlad and didn't allow him to make any stylistic changes despite losing 50-60% of his body weight who would win?"

                The obvious answer to that ridiculous rigged question is Rigo. He would beat any heavyweight in history under those circumstances. Hell so would Donaire, Darchinyan, etc.

                If the question is

                "If you made both fighters into middleweights and allowed them to adapt their styles to that weight, based on the P4P track record of each fighter, who do you think would win?

                In that case I would say Wlad
                How would wlad adapt styles to beat rigo... Wouldn't rigo adapt as well then..

                What is "adapt" or "adapting". Are you saying that if wlad adapted better skills he could beat rigo... If so, then that proves the point that wlad's skills are p4p better than rigo

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by Lebanon View Post
                  If the question is

                  "If you used a shrink ray on Wlad and didn't allow him to make any stylistic changes despite losing 50-60% of his body weight who would win?"

                  The obvious answer to that ridiculous rigged question is Rigo. He would beat any heavyweight in history under those circumstances. Hell so would Donaire, Darchinyan, etc.

                  If the question is

                  "If you made both fighters into middleweights and allowed them to adapt their styles to that weight, based on the P4P track record of each fighter, who do you think would win?

                  In that case I would say Wlad
                  **** off, ur ******ed

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by jas View Post
                    Resume and ability are two different things
                    Yeah, your point being...

                    Think of p4p as what Vegas oddsmakers do..

                    If rigo and wlad had a h2h fight, Vegas would have rigo the favorite, why? Because he is the more skilled and better fighter

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
                      How would wlad adapt styles to beat rigo... Wouldn't rigo adapt as well then..

                      What is "adapt" or "adapting". Are you saying that if wlad adapted better skills he could beat rigo... If so, then that proves the point that wlad's skills are p4p better than rigo
                      why are u replying to that idiot? the guy just said vic darchinyan beats any heavy in history

                      seriously, the standard here is dropping fast

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP