Tim Bradley DID NOT duck Khan.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dirk Diggler UK
    Deleted
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jun 2008
    • 48836
    • 1,312
    • 693
    • 58,902

    #121
    Let's not forget, Khan was lined up to face Mayweather. He was already a bigger name and a bigger draw than Bradley. He didn't need Tim Bradley.

    Now you can bet your bottom dollar that if Khan had said "What if I lose to Bradley, I'm out of the Mayweather sweepstakes", you would definitely not see the likes of IMDAZED and ShoulderTroll in here defending Amir.

    Guaran-dam-teed.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #122
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
      Wow. The spin is incredible. I'm dizzy
      Yeah true. Fighters don't need to use their heads because that never happens.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #123
        Originally posted by IMDAZED
        Yeah true. Fighters don't need to use their heads because that never happens.
        Yes he used his head and realised that he wasn't so sure he could beat Khan.

        One fighter was confident in his abilities, the other wasn't.

        Comment

        • ShoulderRoll
          Join The Great Resist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 56328
          • 10,185
          • 5,035
          • 763,445

          #124
          Originally posted by bojangles1987
          It's EXACTLY the relevant point. You can't say that because the possibility of a better fight exists some unknowable point in the future, that ducking someone isn't a duck. That's ridiculous.
          Bradley signed with Top Rank to get the Pac fight. And Top Rank signed him with the intent to match him up with Pac.

          That was their endgame and why his first fight with TR was on a Pacquiao undercard.

          Whether that fight happened immediately or 2-3 fights down the road wasn't up to Bradley. That was Arum's call.

          Comment

          • IMDAZED
            Fair but Firm
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2006
            • 42644
            • 1,134
            • 1,770
            • 67,152

            #125
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            Yes he used his head and realised that he wasn't so sure he could beat Khan.

            One fighter was confident in his abilities, the other wasn't.
            Or he wasn't confident in judging without any backing. Everyone's got an opinion.

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #126
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              Or he wasn't confident in judging without any backing. Everyone's got an opinion.


              Why didn't he say that then????

              The excuses are laughable.

              Comment

              • IMDAZED
                Fair but Firm
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 42644
                • 1,134
                • 1,770
                • 67,152

                #127
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK


                Why didn't he say that then????

                The excuses are laughable.
                I don't recall him saying I'm not confident in my abilities. You interpret it how you want. Silly to think none of my scenarios are remote possibilities given the events that took place leading to this Bradley-Pacquiao rematch.

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  BoxingScene Icon
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 49445
                  • 5,022
                  • 269
                  • 104,043

                  #128
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll
                  I'm not claiming that was the plan for him, just that this is what ended up actually happening. He was featured on the undercard to increase his name value and his next fight ended up being Pacquiao.
                  I'm pretty sure that's exactly what you were claiming.

                  Otherwise what was the point of the statement? That Bradley was a possible option? Well yeah obviously but he wasn't the first option for the immediate future.

                  You said "A build up to his next fight, Pacquaio-Bradley" not "To build up an eventual fight between them"

                  Bradley-Pacquaio wasn't the first option after that fight and that's an absolute fact.

                  Comment

                  • Dirk Diggler UK
                    Deleted
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jun 2008
                    • 48836
                    • 1,312
                    • 693
                    • 58,902

                    #129
                    Originally posted by IMDAZED
                    I don't recall him saying I'm not confident in my abilities. You interpret it how you want. Silly to think none of my scenarios are remote possibilities given the events that took place leading to this Bradley-Pacquiao rematch.
                    He said "What if I lose to Amir Khan?". If he had meant that he might get robbed on the cards, there was no reason for him to not say that.

                    He also went on to talk about how he's already fought top quality opp and he said "can you give a brother a break?"

                    Also spoke about how he could fight anyone in the top ten on HBO for 1million so he didn't need to face Khan.

                    Where in that does it infer that he's worried about getting robbed on the judges scorecards? Nowhere.

                    You've just invented that like you've invented a whole tonne of **** in this thread to defend your guy.

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #130
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                      He said "What if I lose to Amir Khan?". If he had meant that he might get robbed on the cards, there was no reason for him to not say that.

                      He also went on to talk about how he's already fought top quality opp and he said "can you give a brother a break?"

                      Also spoke about how he could fight anyone in the top ten on HBO for 1million so he didn't need to face Khan.

                      Where in that does it infer that he's worried about getting robbed on the judges scorecards? Nowhere.

                      You've just invented that like you've invented a whole tonne of **** in this thread to defend your guy.
                      I guess we're both inventing. Don't recall him saying he's not confident in his abilities either. Maybe both are just opinions.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP