Tim Bradley DID NOT duck Khan.

[Robbie Barrett]

Or a hint of what I said. Opinions.

You flat out lied about a 2 fight deal. That wasn't an opinion. You just made **** up to try and defend a fighter you like.

[IMDAZED]

No because he didn't say "What if I get robbed in the Amir Khan fight?", did he?

Keep reaching.

No, because he didn't say "I don't feel confident in my abilities", did he?

Keep reaching.

[IMDAZED]

You flat out lied about a 2 fight deal. That wasn't an opinion. You just made **** up to try and defend a fighter you like.

Been a while since I did research on that issue. That was my error and I have no issues taking fault with that. If you'd like to dwell on it or discredit every link I've posted, fair play to you.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No, because he didn't say "I don't feel confident in my abilities", did he?

Keep reaching.

No he did not say that but when a fighter questions whether he'd lose a fight, it's self-explanatory. He thought he might lose to Khan.....legitimately lose. Why is that so hard to admit for you?

If a fighter was worried about being robbed, he'd say "What if I get robbed?", surely?

But this is the all too familiar IMDAZED tactic of arguing over semantics and word play instead of addressing the actual issue.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Been a while since I did research on that issue. That was my error and I have no issues taking fault with that. If you'd like to dwell on it or discredit every link I've posted, fair play to you.

Backtrack, backtrack, backtrack

[ShoulderRoll]

"To chase Pacquaio"

Everyone is chasing Pacquaio dummy. Just like everyone is chasing Mayweather. So does that justify them taking bum fights just because they are "chasing" a bigger fight?

It justifies him signing with Top Rank to chase the Pac fight.

Once he has signed then Arum is the one who tells him what "bum fights" to take and how long he should marinate.

[IMDAZED]

No he did not say that but when a fighter questions whether he'd lose a fight, it's self-explanatory. He thought he might lose to Khan.....legitimately lose. Why is that so hard to admit for you?

If a fighter was worried about being robbed, he'd say "What if I get robbed?", surely?

But this is the all too familiar IMDAZED tactic of arguing over semantics and word play instead of addressing the actual issue.

Well I have a different opinion. Maybe because I don't recall him saying "like...legitimately lose." But that's your opinion which is cool. And I know you can't help yourself but try not to make it about me.

[IMDAZED]

Backtrack, backtrack, backtrack

Or face the situation head on and respond to the poster.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Well I have a different opinion. Maybe because I don't recall him saying "like...legitimately lose." But that's your opinion which is cool. And I know you can't help yourself but try not to make it about me.

Because I've been on this site long enough to know exactly what your agenda is.

Why didn't he mention anything about being robbed then?

[FlatLine]

lmao at the bradtards..

cant believe this thread gone on so long when bradley admitted that he was ducking khan, it aint even up for debate because the words came out his own mouth not his promoters or his managers but his OWN mouth.. lmao