Tim Bradley DID NOT duck Khan.

[Stuntman Mike]

"Looking to" - yes we know you justify certain fighters facing scrubs as long as they're "looking to" face better opponents. I've seen the pattern with you. Bradley, Stevenson, Hopkins. I get it. As long as they eventually get the fight, it doesn't matter that they face bums in between.

The smell of onion bhaji is strong with you my son

[ShoulderRoll]

I think it is relevant because you just said;

"He fought Casamayor on the undercard of Pac-Marquez 3. As a build up to his next fight, Bradley-Pacquiao."

Key word being "Next".

Well, again, that's not true.

I'm not claiming that was the plan for him, just that this is what ended up actually happening. He was featured on the undercard to increase his name value and his next fight ended up being Pacquiao.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Bradley: What if I lose to Amir Khan?

I wonder what part you're missing?

It's literally a sentence that can't be recovered from but these idiots will try.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

The smell of onion bhaji is strong with you my son

Yeah I knew I shouldn't have been around your sister's snatch so much.

[IMDAZED]

Bradley: What if I lose to Amir Khan?

I wonder what part you're missing?

I like to add context. For others their brain can't compute much. Say "duck" and call it a day.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I like to add context. For others their brain can't compute much. Say "duck" and call it a day.

What context do you draw from the sentence "What if I lose to Amir Khan?"

[Stuntman Mike]

It's literally a sentence that can't be recovered from but these idiots will try.

As I already said,anything is possible and every boxer including mayweather probably thinks about the consequences of losing their next fight and have a plan for it,bradley made the right choice because there was a slight possibility he could have lost to khan and as said before regarding the "anything is possible" khan might not look like a newborn deer in his next fight.

So even things that seem certain like bradley whooping khan and khan getting blitzed next time he fights a credible fighter might not happen

[IMDAZED]

What context do you draw from the sentence "What if I lose to Amir Khan?"

Really, this isn't that difficult.

Bradley's contract with Shaw expired one month before the proposed Khan fight. Let's say Bradley loses a controversial decision. Or it's a robbery. Or it's a damn good fight with Khan winning but Bradley proving himself to be dangerous. Either way, he has nothing to fall back on if that occurred and has no backing to get a rematch or any other big match without the possibility of getting screwed at the negotiating table.

It's so ****** to think fighters at that level don't make moves based on anything other than finances. I don't know about you but I'm pretty much the same way when it comes to my vocation.

[bojangles1987]

It's true that Bradley was on Pac's undercard in an effort to build up to the Pac fight. Whether that was going to happen immediately after or a couple of fights down the road is not the relevant point.

It's EXACTLY the relevant point. You can't say that because the possibility of a better fight exists some unknowable point in the future, that ducking someone isn't a duck. That's ridiculous.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Really, this isn't that difficult.

Bradley's contract with Shaw expired one month before the proposed Khan fight. Let's say Bradley loses a controversial decision. Or it's a robbery. Or it's a damn good fight with Khan winning but Bradley proving himself to be dangerous. Either way, he has nothing to fall back on if that occurred and has no backing to get a rematch or any other big match without the possibility of getting screwed at the negotiating table.

It's so ****** to think fighters at that level don't make moves based on anything other than finances. I don't know about you but I'm pretty much the same way when it comes to my vocation.

Wow. The spin is incredible. I'm dizzy