Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nonbiased accurate look at Floyd's resume.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Most biased and ball washing thread! Ha hey Larry is that you?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by MurkaMan View Post
      First thing I want to say is that Im not a f.lomo.
      Incorrect.

      Comment


      • Reporter: " Where does Floyd rank among All Time Greats?"

        Bernard Hopkins: "aww..Top 3"


        ***thread closed***

        Umm, moderator, would you ensure that this thread is closed please?


        Comment


        • Have some respect for Margarito.
          By the way, the bias in your post shows your true colors.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
            If he was born to box he wouldnt fight so little in his prime, and avoid Pac and other challenges. Hed be fight Martinez instead of Cotto fighting him.

            He may be dedicated in training and getting as good as he can, but not showing his potential with challenging himself.
            He didnt fight Pac but who cares? Fighting Pac takes away all of these performances that no other fighter in history could duplicate? Who said he was obligated to fight Martinez? Floyd cant even make 154, to me I always felt that any fight above 147 is a bonus fight. So let me ask you this. Even tho he ducked Pac, and wont fight Martinez, what fighter in history can take the guys that he DID fight, and make them look clumsey and dumb? Because all of this talk about him ducking Pac is not going to distract me from my argument. Look at the comments, it hasnt worked so far...

            Comment


            • Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
              Has Murka said anything about Ortiz beating Leonard yet?
              I know you made this comment because you cant debate with me on this one. I proved to everyone that even without him facing Pac, no fighter in history could do to Floyd's opponents what Floyd has done to them. None. No fighter in history was in their prime at the age of 37. No fighter in history was born to do nothing except box. No fighter in history can completely change their fighting styles in order to dominate an opponent without being GRAZED. Floyd is the absolute best fighter I have EVER witnessed. Its nothing you can say about that is it? Go and get Bushbaby and tell him to brang his punkazz to the stage. Im waiting...

              Comment


              • Originally posted by The Noose View Post
                Yep. You got me....Im really mad that you aint arguing about Floyd ducking Pac. Thats it.

                But lets summarise this thread:
                A nonbiased, accurate look at Floyds resume = Floyd is the best. He would walk through Leonard and Hearns, and JMM was his best win.

                You made this comment because you couldnt challenge my opinion and I understand that. I just hope people start treating this guy like he deserves to be treated. I dont care if he ducked Pac or not, this dude is the most skilled fighter in the history of professional pugilism, Boxing, MMA, ANY fight sport EVER. Their will NEVER be a Fight God like this. I just hate how media manipulates casual fans into thinking that he only does what he does because his opponents are bums, or old, or young. No matter the age, style, he makes it where he hits you and you land nothing. And his face is almost taciturn. He doesnt even smile as much as he used to. He has turned into a full blown businessman in the ring. SRL, Pernell, Ali used to showboat which I found entertaining. But Floyd is just an android. Its crazy how a guy like Floyd has no desire to showboat or act silly in the ring. The only time I seen him do something was when Canelo hit the ropes. He's a very special fighter whether you hate him or not.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by fabie View Post
                  yes he IS the greatest and he didn't duck anyone...like Floyd. Ali fought the best and the very best in their prime in his time.
                  If Ali was Floyd's size would he do to Floyd's opponents what Floyd did to them? I like the way you ignore the fact that Ali was washed up at 37. You also ignore the fact that Ali was tactically flawed. Respond to those comments please, tnx.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by RAV3N View Post
                    In 10 years time people will look at a fighter's resume and that is how they will be judged.

                    Having 0 losses means nothing unless you fight the best.
                    I didnt say anything about being undefeated. I talked about him being the most skilled fighter in the history of boxing. Being in his prime at 37, being born to box and only box. And true or false, he fought the absolute best at Golden boy at the time he fought them? True or false, when he fought them, you all EXAGGERATED and CLAIMED that he fought them because of this or that?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by MurkaMan View Post
                      If Ali was Floyd's size would he do to Floyd's opponents what Floyd did to them? I like the way you ignore the fact that Ali was washed up at 37. You also ignore the fact that Ali was tactically flawed. Respond to those comments please, tnx.
                      How can you look anyone in the eye and tell them you are a boxing fan?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP