Nonbiased accurate look at Floyd's resume.

[daggum]

And btw those are FACTS that he chased Oscar and Gatti. It is a FACT that he didnt love boxing anymore and even SAID so. Its a FACT that after the fight he said he felt he had accomplished everything he set out to. So what did he set out to accomplish? What did he chase his whole career? Oscar and Gatti. Its a FACT that he fought like a lazy fighter against them both. You just WANT it to be something its not, so you can find away to avoid admitting that he is the best fighter in history.

so he chased these guys his entire career then fought lazy against them? wow what an idiot.

[MurkaMan]

Have some respect for Margarito.
By the way, the bias in your post shows your true colors.

Everyone knows Im not biased. Im not here arguing over who ducked Pacman, and blaming Arum. Floyd ducked Pac blatantly. But it doesnt matter. What fighter in history can do what Floyd does? What fighter in history was in their prime at 37? No fighter will ever come to the sport of fighting EVER on this level.

[daggum]

Everyone knows Im not biased. Im not here arguing over who ducked Pacman, and blaming Arum. Floyd ducked Pac blatantly. But it doesnt matter. What fighter in history can do what Floyd does? What fighter in history was in their prime at 37? No fighter will ever come to the sport of fighting EVER on this level.

do you have an alt on here with the name Everyone?

[MurkaMan]

How can you look anyone in the eye and tell them you are a boxing fan?

So your not going to answer any of my questions? I will ask again; What fighter in history can fight Floyd's opponents, and consistantly change their fighting styles in order to dominate them all without being GRAZED? Making them look clumsey and dumb. Sure they may beat them or maybe even stop them. But skillwise would they posses the tools, versitilty, work ethic to make them look foolish? Another question I asked is wasnt Ali washed up at 37, and lost to Spinks who had 7 fking fights? What fighter in history is truly born to do nothing except BOX, and was in their prime at 37? I have NEVER seen a fighter like this in history. No stop acting IGNORANT and answer my question. If you cant, then just go away. You sound like a person who is afraid to admit the truth. So you will leave troll comments to skip around it.

[MurkaMan]

do you have an alt on here with the name Everyone?

Im glad your here. I wanted to typical haters to come in. Its no way you can argue with me about anything. Floyd is just the perfect fighter. Never seen anything like it myself. You havent either. But you hate him so your post are biased and not worth taking serious. My posts arent biased. I said it time and time again, he ducked Pac and I even admitted that he may be using roids. Everything I speak is real and nonbiased.

[MurkaMan]

so he chased these guys his entire career then fought lazy against them? wow what an idiot.

Yea. They werent credible foes. Are you going to tell me that the Floyd who fought Oscar is better than the Floyd who fought Canelo and JMM? No fighter in history can beat the Floyd who fought Canelo. Floyd looked at Oscar as a washed up fighter anyways. I think he thought he was going to win easily. And true or false, didnt he retire shortly and even admitted that he didnt LOVE boxing anymore? Didnt he fight like a person who was DONE with the sport? Be honest.

And btw, I didnt mean to say he was lazy against Gatti. He was still young against Gatti. I meant to say he was lazy against Hatton and his footwork was awful.

[MurkaMan]

no it wasn't the best fight to make. pac was ranked #1. you do realize boxing consists of more than golden boy promotions right? if you don't want to work with anyone else that's your own fault but you can't just pretend they don't exist.

But I said he DUCKED Pac. How many times do I have to say that? Or your going to pretend to ignore it, because you know that it doesnt matter whether he ducked him or not. No fighter in history can take the guys that he DID face and beat them like Floyd did.

[MurkaMan]

You certainly don't need anyone's help being lumped in with the fanboys.

This is a hilarious thread.

You sound bitter because you have no argument. Im right on this one. You all felt that it revolved around him ducking Pac. It doesnt even matter. With or without Pac, this dude can fking fight.

[daggum]

Yea. They werent credible foes. Are you going to tell me that the Floyd who fought Oscar is better than the Floyd who fought Canelo and JMM? No fighter in history can beat the Floyd who fought Canelo. Floyd looked at Oscar as a washed up fighter anyways. I think he thought he was going to win easily. And true or false, didnt he retire shortly and even admitted that he didnt LOVE boxing anymore? Didnt he fight like a person who was DONE with the sport? Be honest.

And btw, I didnt mean to say he was lazy against Gatti. He was still young against Gatti. I meant to say he was lazy against Hatton and his footwork was awful.

the canelo who fought angulo would destroy floyd. it's too bad that episode of the golden boy soap opera had floyd winning. stay tuned for the upcoming episodes. i heard it's going to get good! secret love triangle between oscar, floyd, and haymon?

[MurkaMan]

dude you must be dumb as rocks. how can floyd, an all defensive, undefeated fighter who was never into wars, became suddenly washed up before he was 30 fvkkin yrs old?



anyway, go on your way. you're not convincing anyone anyhow here, even the sensible floyd fans

Do you think the Floyd who faced Oscar could beat the Floyd who faced Canelo? The Floyd who faced Oscar admitted that he didnt even LOVE boxing anymore. Did he fight like he loved it? He only threw jabs and didnt even try. Yes Floyd was washed up and he looked bad against Hatton too. I actually think Floyd is better today them when he fought Shane, Baldo, Ortiz. But he was younger then? What fighter in history can age backwards? Name one.