Do you think Duran top 10 P4P list???

[DiegoFuego]

1) your thought, far from a fact

2) the majority of ppl think tyson is the greatest hw to lace em up

they do not. I've never heard anyone seriously put Tyson in the top 5-8 heavyweights. I don't think you can make a case for Tyson being top 10 heavyweights, and Duran is easily among the best Lightweights. That's a whole different ballpark, saying people think Tyson was one of the greatest. Nobody believes that.

[wmute]

I think the majority of people, boxing fans or not, view Duran as the worst of the Fabulous Four.

you put that in os the majority of ppl, boxing fans or not, believe tyson is the greatest HE

[GunStar]

No....


& I don't believe Hagler, Leonard, Hearns, etc.....are better than Duran.

Hagler & Leonard are better. Hearns & Duran are about even.

[DiegoFuego]

you put that in os the majority of ppl, boxing fans or not, believe tyson is the greatest HE

dude, my uncles and their friends all agree Hagler > Leonard > Hearns > Duran

but not one of them thinks Tyson was one of the best heavyweights ever. they are all CASUAL boxing fans at best. they know the names and that's it.

[jabsRstiff]

Hagler & Leonard are better. Hearns & Duran are about even.

Hagler is my favorite fighter, ever. I still don't believe that he's as great as Duran....lb4lb.

[wmute]

Why do you keep asking me about my top 10. How about yours? What's the point of your question?

Duran doesn't belong in there.

Please be more consistent with your arguments.

my arguments are pretty consistent, i will give you a synopsis:

you say:

duran is not top10 p4p because he is not xyz

my answer:

well find me someone (10 fighters in particular) who are xyz

if you cannot find them, your claim that duran is not top 10p4p because he is not xyz, does not hold even from a logical point of view

[GunStar]

Hagler is my favorite fighter, ever. I still don't believe that he's as great as Duran....lb4lb.

Not many have better resume then Hagler.

[jabsRstiff]

Not many have better resume then Hagler.

What do you consider more impressive on Hagler's resume.....
The big names he beat towards the end of his career....or the lesser known, but bad-ass, middles from the 70's ?

[wmute]

dude, my uncles and their friends all agree Hagler > Leonard > Hearns > Duran

but not one of them thinks Tyson was one of the best heavyweights ever. they are all CASUAL boxing fans at best. they know the names and that's it.

dude, your uncles and their friends is a bit of a small sample, don't you think?

moreover duran's fights in his prime were not televised and hyped like the ones in the 80s, so it's quite obvious that if you have seen fight only the 4 of them you have that ranking (or leonard on top... GRRRR)

[GunStar]

What do you consider more impressive on Hagler's resume.....
The big names he beat towards the end of his career....or the lesser known, but bad-ass, middles from the 70's ?

Both are impressive. He stopped the 4 people that he lost to or had a draw with. He stopped all four guys, with the exception of Leonard. Which I think Hagler won it by a point.

I still haven't seen another Hagler, the man was unreal, never been hurt in his life, 60+ wins. He kept his great chin forever, not like some others I can name.