Do you think Duran top 10 P4P list???

[Chups]

Sorry ...Duran does not make top 10 all time. That list has a bunch of heavyweights on it + a few middleweights. Ali, Robinson, Louis, Leonard, Dempsey, Johnson,...etc....

[JoartCC]

1) your thought, far from a fact

2) the majority of ppl think tyson is the greatest hw to lace em up

LOl! My thoughts? Not a fact?

Well sue me! What's a more plain fact than these?

Duran vs Hearns = KTFO'd
Duran vs Hagler = beat beat beat
Duran vs Sugar = "no mas" quitter

Is that deserving of p4p great? lol! It's getting funnier how your side argues your points.

[JoartCC]

my arguments are pretty consistent, i will give you a synopsis:

you say:

duran is not top10 p4p because he is not xyz

my answer:

well find me someone (10 fighters in particular) who are xyz

if you cannot find them, your claim that duran is not top 10p4p because he is not xyz, does not hold even from a logical point of view

You're trying to ask me to present evidence that Duran aint p4p great. And yet when I do, you can't accept it.

Duran < Hagler Hearns SUGAR

That's a simple fact and yet you cannot comprehend?

[cple]

Duran < Hagler?

Hagler loses to a past-his-prime natural welterweight in Leonard, while Duran beats the natuarlly larger, prime Leonard, yet Hagler is somehow the greater of the two?

Duran's reign at lightweight was just as dominant as Hagler's reign at middleweight, if not moreso.

[wmute]

LOl! My thoughts? Not a fact?

Well sue me! What's a more plain fact than these?

Duran vs Hearns = KTFO'd
Duran vs Hagler = beat beat beat
Duran vs Sugar = "no mas" quitter

Is that deserving of p4p great? lol! It's getting funnier how your side argues your points.

first I was arguing with diegofuego

second, his sentence i referred to clearly stated "I think" and it went on like "the majority of ppl think"

so I don't get the meaning of your reply

[wmute]

You're trying to ask me to present evidence that Duran aint p4p great. And yet when I do, you can't accept it.

Duran < Hagler Hearns SUGAR

That's a simple fact and yet you cannot comprehend?

you do have issues

if you say that duran is not at the top 10 of a list because he lacks something, you should present other examples (10 in particular, i'll solve the troublesome math for you) that have that something, so you can justify that he is out of a top 10.

it is easy, why don't you do it

you can go on and tell me that he quit against leonard, got koes by hearns and lost to hagler, but then you have to find 10 fighters who did better, otherwise your statements don't imply he is not top 10 p4p, do you get it? can you read?

[jabsRstiff]

joart & his like...

Won't be making any top ten lists on here. Why ?
Because they don't have the knowledge of the past to make one up....& if they do manage to come up with ten names, they know the list will be savagely torn apart.

Basically, their lack of knowledge, when it comes to boxing history, is exactly why we're all debating with them right now. That, & the fact that they are smitten far too much with their homeboy.

[JOM'S]

I don't know about top 10 but this guy is damn scary!!!!

I wonder who he is talking to ???

[jabsRstiff]

I wonder who he is talking to ???

Probably some Filipinos at ringside.

[czars_salad]

Probably some Filipinos at ringside.

no mas! no mas!