Floyd's response on his hand-picked opponents
Collapse
-
It's called a stream brahSame stuff, different day. I'm not gonna buy, I'm not gonna watch. Then as soon as the fight is over the same posters log on with -the fight was fixed, did you see the illegal elbows in rds 2, 4 and 10?
The next post from the same poster -I fell asleep the fight was so boring.
The next post from the same poster-yeah I saw the way the ref allowed floyd to cheat in the middle rounds.
Then the same poster stays up to 430 in the morning creating threads about floyds resume.
Then on Monday they log and claim they don't watch floyd fights.Comment
-
Comment
-
-
As of now, 1 mil plus, MAYBE reaching or topping 1.25 mil.
A lot of people watched Broner v Maidana. A lot of casual fans think Maidana beat a Floyd clone. Lot of people voted in the polls for Maidana. That said the media hasn't exactly supported the fight heavily and floyd will be a 4-1 favorite at least.Comment
-
well, i dont see how this discussion can continue if you are going to contradict yourself. if you would like to think that all four belt holders are champions then so be it.so it's bad to call them what they are? take you're opinion out of it because it's not about you bruh, we're talking facts. When Steve Nash was getting back to back MVP's he never got my recognition, clearly the best basketbal player in the world was Kobe Bryant, but, Steve Nash had the title, therefore he was in fact the MVP regardless of what anyone's opinion is.Comment
-
There is a longer list of fighters he wouldn't fight. Cotto was on that list til he was knocked out by Pacman.Maidana- WBA Champ (coming off his biggest win)
Canelo- WBC/WBA Champ (coming off his biggest win)
Guerrero- Interim WBC Champ (coming off his biggest win)
Cotto- WBA Champ (coming off his biggest win at the weight)
Ortiz- WBC Champ (coming off his biggest win)
Mosley- WBA Champ (coming off the win that solidified his p4p status)
Keep on cherry picking Floyd.Comment
-
Comment
-
[QUOTE=The Big Dunn;14316214]Come on. You've been around here long enough to know how it works. You get a piece of video, etc etc.
Your post has merit because you expect the best to be held to a different standard. whats problematic is when you suggest he isn't the best (as you did above) then fail to hold the guy who you think is the best to the same standard as floyd or criticize that fighter in the same vein.
Floyd said what he said. The video wasn't spliced or dubbed, it was a series of complete sentences that included he doesn't get the credit he deserves despite his continuous victories. I wish I could find it, it's on this site somewhere.
My suggestion that he isn't the best is a direct reflection of my feelings on his cherry-picking. We only know he's the best at beating those he chooses to fight. As for failing to hold the guy I believe is the best to the same standards, now you are making assumptions that you can't substantiate. What guy do I think is the best? In what instance did I fail to hold him to the same standards as Mayweather?Comment
Comment