My opinion
Why is this even a thread? Hopkins defeated Tito for the same reasons he defeated Oscar, Wright, and Pavlik. He was too BIG! He did what he was supposed to do in those fights. What was so impressive about any of those wins? Would he have done that to a fighter his size? Of course not. Hopkins is feather-fisted. He has decent pop in the right hand but that's it. I never liked him or his "survival" style. He should've been a wrestler. He's over-rated. Hagler and Monzon both were better and would've beat him. Hagler is the greatest middleweight ever, not Robinson. Leonard is the greatest "Sugar" and would've beaten both Hopkins and Robinson.
Why is this even a thread? Hopkins defeated Tito for the same reasons he defeated Oscar, Wright, and Pavlik. He was too BIG! He did what he was supposed to do in those fights. What was so impressive about any of those wins? Would he have done that to a fighter his size? Of course not. Hopkins is feather-fisted. He has decent pop in the right hand but that's it. I never liked him or his "survival" style. He should've been a wrestler. He's over-rated. Hagler and Monzon both were better and would've beat him. Hagler is the greatest middleweight ever, not Robinson. Leonard is the greatest "Sugar" and would've beaten both Hopkins and Robinson.

Comment