Comments Thread For: Groves Slaps Carl Froch By Questioning His Manhood

[Dirk Diggler UK]

But what if froch gets a smaller fight than groves?

Then he'd be following in George Groves' footsteps.

Froch doesn't fight Noe Gonzalez's and Bakar Baka**** though. We know this.

[Money_May]

[Frank Ducketts]

You don't care because you didn't know who Groves was until about a week ago you dumb ****. Stop trying to pretend that you know ANYTHING about boxing.

Clowns like you try to deflect what happened to your boy because you never want to see your fighter in that position/trouble again. You're a true clown in the truest sense. This **** won't fly with real fans. Groves gave your boy hell, and we want to see it again.

Trying to justify your position with a "you didn't know Groves until" stfu, lmao. You've been using this excuse ever since that fight.

[LacedUp]

That was your main point. It's in the past so it doesn't matter.

George Groves wasn't interested in the rematch because he already "bashed up" DeGale. I guess Froch already bashed him up so no rematch.

The Anderson stoppage was WORSE than the Froch-Groves stoppage. Anderson dropped him and was roughing him up. As soon as Groves got on top for a few seconds, the ref jumped in to stop it.

Didn't he say he bashed him up before they actually fought? Don't recall him saying he bashed him up after they fought - could be wrong though. Regardless, there's a difference between two young guys fighting it out for a close decision in a British title fight compared to losing a fishy TKO in a world title fight after dominating most rounds and dropping your opponent in the process.

Degale and groves both know they'll fight again. But why waste it on a British title fight? It wouldn't be PPV again and a second loss wouldn't do good to Degales career should he lose. That being said, I think they should fight. But how much demand was there for a sequel to a fight that didn't live up to expectations first time around?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Clowns like you try to deflect what happened to your boy because you never want to see your fighter in that position/trouble again. You're a true clown in the truest sense. This **** won't fly with real fans. Groves gave your boy hell, and we want to see it again.

Trying to justify your position with a "you didn't know Groves until" stfu, lmao. You've been using this excuse ever since that fight.

I'm not trying to deflect anything you fat faaggot. I made a point about Groves' past and you tried to deflect by saying it doesn't matter cos you don't know ****. You literally know *** all about boxing outside of Floyd Mayweather's scrotum. I asked you to name an opponent for Fury - you couldn't. And yesterday I saw you saying that Kirkland beat Molina by TKO lol. You are literally the biggest ***ing moron on this site. Go choke on a **** and die.

Didn't he say he bashed him up before they actually fought? Don't recall him saying he bashed him up after they fought - could be wrong though. Regardless, there's a difference between two young guys fighting it out for a close decision in a British title fight compared to losing a fishy TKO in a world title fight after dominating most rounds and dropping your opponent in the process.

Degale and groves both know they'll fight again. But why waste it on a British title fight? It wouldn't be PPV again and a second loss wouldn't do good to Degales career should he lose. That being said, I think they should fight. But how much demand was there for a sequel to a fight that didn't live up to expectations first time around?

Yeah the difference is that Carl Froch is a proven fighter who's literally fought everyone and doesn't have to do anything that some chump like Groves says.

George Groves was an unproven prospect who stole a decision against another prospect and then thought he was too good to rematch him. And then he had the nerve to throw the British title in a bin to duck a rematch with Anderson who he beat by controversial stoppage.

The guy is a hypocrite and anyone defending him whilst criticising Froch are jokes

[umop-ap!sdn]

Groves should separate himself from the typical UK fighters and stop dwelling on a domestic rivalry. He already earned the respect as the man to beat up Froch, if i were him i would use the momentum to try and land a big fight in the U.S. and let Froch go home with his ball.

[kiaba360]

As much as we would all love to see the re-match, I think there is morem oney to be made in fighting Chavez Jr. HBO ppv is worth more than Sky PPV, Froch Groves wasn't even picked up mainstream us channel. As a fan would love the rematch, but if I'm Froch, looking at business and payday, I'm fighting the mexican!

Considering how good the first fight was, maybe HBO would pick up the rematch.

[EvilGenius]

This is golden
ha ha ha

[BattlingNelson]

i think it's strange that some people are trying to justify froch not giving groves a rematch. They try to point out ****** stuff from the past that is not relevant by saying groves should have rematched so and so when there was virtually no demand for it but ignore what IS relevant. who gives a shit about who should have done what in the past ... all that matters is who should do what right now and right now Froch should give groves the rematch ... not even for groves but for himself ... if he doesn't give groves the rematch all of froch's previous achievement will be overshadowed forever more by the fact that FROCH DUCKED GROVES.

If anybody talks about froch in say 5 years time ... anybody creates a thread about him etc you can be GUARANTEED that within about 3 posts from the OP somebody will say ... FROCH DUCKED GROVES ... and whats more they would be right.

The idiot froch uber fans (I say uber fans cause I have been quite the froch fan in the past) don't seem to realise that simple fact. Not re matching groves will GREATLY hurt Froch's legacy. Do froch fans not believe Froch would beat groves in a rematch is that it? Do they not think he could PROVE that the win was legit? That is the only reason I can think of why they wouldn't want it. If they really believed he'd beat groves in a rematch they would be happy for them to do it again. They saw the fight though they saw how tough Froch was having it ... they are not confident he'd win ... hence they want to take the dodgy win and move on rather than risk losing in search of a legit win over groves.

Waitng for the ... But Groves should have rematched that kid ... Johny mac fart a lot who George fought in the play ground when he was six ... that was a pretty close decision ... why didn't Groves rematch him?

What of Froch retired? Would you still say that he ducked Groves?

[cuzzlo]

Screw Groves, he lost and was looking jaded and spent before the stoppage. It is what it is, he gave it his best but would not have survived the shellacking. Froch, man up, fight Ward again and retire.