Comments Thread For: Groves Slaps Carl Froch By Questioning His Manhood

[Daddy T]

i think it's strange that some people are trying to justify froch not giving groves a rematch. They try to point out ****** stuff from the past that is not relevant by saying groves should have rematched so and so when there was virtually no demand for it but ignore what IS relevant. who gives a shit about who should have done what in the past ... all that matters is who should do what right now and right now Froch should give groves the rematch ... not even for groves but for himself ... if he doesn't give groves the rematch all of froch's previous achievement will be overshadowed forever more by the fact that FROCH DUCKED GROVES.

If anybody talks about froch in say 5 years time ... anybody creates a thread about him etc you can be GUARANTEED that within about 3 posts from the OP somebody will say ... FROCH DUCKED GROVES ... and whats more they would be right.

The idiot froch uber fans (I say uber fans cause I have been quite the froch fan in the past) don't seem to realise that simple fact. Not re matching groves will GREATLY hurt Froch's legacy. Do froch fans not believe Froch would beat groves in a rematch is that it? Do they not think he could PROVE that the win was legit? That is the only reason I can think of why they wouldn't want it. If they really believed he'd beat groves in a rematch they would be happy for them to do it again. They saw the fight though they saw how tough Froch was having it ... they are not confident he'd win ... hence they want to take the dodgy win and move on rather than risk losing in search of a legit win over groves.

Waitng for the ... But Groves should have rematched that kid ... Johny mac fart a lot who George fought in the play ground when he was six ... that was a pretty close decision ... why didn't Groves rematch him?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Hypocrisy is irrelevant because it's in the past.

Interesting.

[Daddy T]

Hypocrisy is irrelevant because it's in the past.

Interesting.

I see you didn't answer the points I knew you wouldn't

[LacedUp]

A bid for what? Warren wanted the board to order a rematch. Most people felt DeGale won but yeah that doesn't call for a rematch

Groves fought bums until Eddie Hearn manipulated the rankings to get him an undeserved shot at Froch. DeGale was the European champion and better than anyone Groves fought.

Hell Kenny Anderson was better and we all know how Groves shameless "Hayemakered" his way out of that rematch too.

A bid. Why didn't he offer Groves a sum of money to fight DeGale again. Why would the board order an immediate rematch? Nothing fishy went on. it was close either way you look at. Most people don't think he won. People have different opinions.

DeGale was not EBU champion when groves fought him. Plus, Groves beat degale so he clearly deserved a shot more than him.

Groves legitimately stopped Anderson, so because Kenny knocked him down he deserves a rematch? come on. I think they should have fought at the time, don't really recall what changed ot.

[Daddy T]

A bid. Why didn't he offer Groves a sum of money to fight DeGale again. Why would the board order an immediate rematch? Nothing fishy went on. it was close either way you look at. Most people don't think he won. People have different opinions.

DeGale was not EBU champion when groves fought him. Plus, Groves beat degale so he clearly deserved a shot more than him.

Groves legitimately stopped Anderson, so because Kenny knocked him down he deserves a rematch? come on. I think they should have fought at the time, don't really recall what changed ot.

Well since he can't deny that groves deserves a rematch I guess all he can do is invent reasons why groves should have rematched guys in the past and try to call it hypocrisy. All **** riders ignore sense and logic when presented with it and just harp on about the same thing again and again making themselves look like an idiot to everybody but the ****** in the mirror. You see it with the pactards ... the flomos the klit lickers and here with dirk and his man love for froch.

Love is not logical lol

[Dirk Diggler UK]

I see you didn't answer the points I knew you wouldn't

That was your main point. It's in the past so it doesn't matter.

A bid. Why didn't he offer Groves a sum of money to fight DeGale again. Why would the board order an immediate rematch? Nothing fishy went on. it was close either way you look at. Most people don't think he won. People have different opinions.

DeGale was not EBU champion when groves fought him. Plus, Groves beat degale so he clearly deserved a shot more than him.

Groves legitimately stopped Anderson, so because Kenny knocked him down he deserves a rematch? come on. I think they should have fought at the time, don't really recall what changed ot.

George Groves wasn't interested in the rematch because he already "bashed up" DeGale. I guess Froch already bashed him up so no rematch.

The Anderson stoppage was WORSE than the Froch-Groves stoppage. Anderson dropped him and was roughing him up. As soon as Groves got on top for a few seconds, the ref jumped in to stop it.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Well since he can't deny that groves deserves a rematch I guess all he can do is invent reasons why groves should have rematched guys in the past and try to call it hypocrisy. All **** riders ignore sense and logic when presented with it and just harp on about the same thing again and again making themselves look like an idiot to everybody but the ****** in the mirror. You see it with the pactards ... the flomos the klit lickers and here with dirk and his man love for froch.

Love is not logical lol

I don't deny that Groves deserves a rematch. I have nothing against this rematch but Groves' pathetic attempts to goad and question Froch's bottle when he has ducked rematches in the past is absolutely hilarious.

And watching the Johnny come lately mugs like you eat it up because it's in fashion is even funnier.

If Froch gets a bigger fight then Groves can eat a **** and like it.

[Daddy T]

I don't deny that Groves deserves a rematch. I have nothing against this rematch but Groves' pathetic attempts to goad and question Froch's bottle when he has ducked rematches in the past is absolutely hilarious.

And watching the Johnny come lately mugs like you eat it up because it's in fashion is even funnier.

If Froch gets a bigger fight then Groves can eat a **** and like it.

But what if froch gets a smaller fight than groves?

[handsome1-1]

Agree with groves 100%. Froch u p ussy, man up haha

[FrankieBruno]

Froch must be shook, cuz he is willing to walk away from millions of pounds and record breaking British boxing event at Wembley stadium

there is no reason for Froch to avoid this fight unless he can fight Ward, other than that he has lost has bottle if he doesn't do the right thing

Even Eddie Hern wants it to happen,